Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

ShareDrop VS Apache CXF

Compare ShareDrop VS Apache CXF and see what are their differences

ReleasePad
Changelog software that turns GitHub commits into release notes your users actually see — inside your app. Built for founders and teams who ship fast. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

ShareDrop logo ShareDrop

HTML5 clone of Apple's AirDrop - easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index
  • ShareDrop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-08
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29

ShareDrop features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    ShareDrop offers a straightforward and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to transfer files without needing to install special software or understand complex protocols.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The service works across different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, facilitating seamless file sharing regardless of the device being used.
  • No Account Required
    Users can share files without the need to create an account, enhancing privacy and reducing the barrier to entry.
  • Encryption
    ShareDrop uses end-to-end encryption to ensure that the files being shared are secure and can only be accessed by the intended recipient.
  • Peer-to-Peer Transfer
    Files are transmitted directly between devices (peer-to-peer), which can result in faster transfer speeds compared to cloud-based solutions.

Possible disadvantages of ShareDrop

  • Internet Connection Required
    Despite being a peer-to-peer service, an internet connection is still necessary to initiate the connection between devices.
  • Mobile Use Limitations
    While ShareDrop can be used on mobile browsers, the experience may not be as seamless or optimized as on desktop browsers, potentially leading to usability issues.
  • Size Limitations
    There may be limitations on the size of files that can be transferred, depending on browser capabilities and internet connection speed.
  • One-Time Use
    ShareDrop is designed for one-time file transfers and does not offer functionality for long-term storage or file history tracking.
  • Browser Dependence
    The service relies on browser capabilities and may not work optimally on older or less common browsers, limiting its accessibility.

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

Analysis of ShareDrop

Overall verdict

  • ShareDrop is a good option for users looking for a simple, secure, and fast way to transfer files between devices over the same network. Its ease of use and lack of requirement for an account or software installation make it a convenient choice for many situations.

Why this product is good

  • ShareDrop is an open-source, browser-based application that facilitates the easy transfer of files between devices without the need for third-party software installation. It uses a peer-to-peer connection powered by WebRTC, ensuring that files are transferred securely and directly between devices, which can be particularly useful for users concerned about privacy.

Recommended for

    ShareDrop is recommended for individuals or teams who need to transfer files quickly and securely within a local network. It is especially useful for non-technical users who prefer a straightforward solution, and for those who prioritize privacy since it does not store files on external servers.

ShareDrop videos

+ Add

SupraTouch #4: ShareDrop (análisis app/web)

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ShareDrop and Apache CXF)

ShareDrop

Apache CXF

File Sharing
100 100%
File Sharing
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Cloud Storage
100 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0
Ruby Web Framework
0 0%
Ruby Web Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ShareDrop and Apache CXF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ShareDrop seems to be a lot more popular than Apache CXF. While we know about 26 links to ShareDrop, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Apache CXF. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ShareDrop mentions (26)

  • P2P local file transfer based on WebRTC
    Reminds me of https://sharedrop.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Which web browser (apart from Firefox) do you use and why?
    Can you check if sharedrop.io is working on Mull? On my device, it can see the other party but it can't save file. Source: about 3 years ago
  • P2P File Transfer
    I googled about it, so im here to ask. Aren't there any APP that does P2P file sharing anymore? I found a website called sharedrop.io and it seems to work, but Im looking for alternatives. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How to setup Adguard Ad Blocker, Adguard DNS and Adguard VPN best to work together on Android?
    I've only added one extra blocklist into the blocker. I have added one application bypass: I've installed Samsung Internet and placed it in the app bypass list and ONLY access sharedrop.io with it. Sharedrop is a great quick and dirty (and local network only) transfer program that doesn't work while under the blocker, so I made a desktop and bookmark link that only goes to that page. Everything else stays... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Can i send files through email directly to my boox device instead of sending them through the BooxApp?
    If you are on the same network, you can try https://sharedrop.io. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 3 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ShareDrop and Apache CXF, you can also consider the following products

Snapdrop - An open source alternative to Alternative to AirDrop.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

SHAREit - SHAREit allows you to transfer files and data from your phone to another device without having to rely on WiFi or a data plan.

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

PairDrop - Local file sharing in your browser. Inspired by Apple's AirDrop. Fork of Snapdrop.

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

Loading...