Software Alternatives & Startups

Sejda VS utterances

Compare Sejda VS utterances and see what are their differences

Sejda

Split, merge and other powerful PDF tools.

Rating
0 reviews
utterances

A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, utterances should be more popular than Sejda. It has been mentioned 53 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 53
PDF Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 88

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Sejda
utterances
Website sejda.com utteranc.es
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Sejda 5 features
utterances 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Sejda features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of tech-savviness.
  • Wide Range of PDF Tools
    Sejda offers a comprehensive set of tools for editing, merging, splitting, compressing, and converting PDFs, catering to diverse user needs.
  • Cloud Integration
    Sejda allows users to import and export files directly from popular cloud storage services like Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive, enhancing workflow efficiency.
  • Security Features
    The platform provides options for adding passwords and encryption to PDFs, ensuring that sensitive information remains secure.
  • Free Usage Tier
    Sejda offers a free version that allows users to perform basic PDF tasks without any cost, making it accessible to budget-conscious individuals and small businesses.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Free Version
    The free plan comes with limitations such as a cap on the number of tasks performed per day and restrictions on the size of files that can be processed, which may not be sufficient for heavy users.
  • Subscription Cost
    The premium plans, while offering more features, can be relatively costly, which might be a concern for individual users or small businesses.
  • Internet Dependency
    As an online tool, Sejda requires a stable internet connection for optimal performance, which might be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Sejda covers a wide range of basic to intermediate PDF functionalities, it may lack some advanced features that professional users might require, such as advanced form filling and data extraction.
  • Performance on Large Files
    Users may experience slower performance or occasional glitches when working with very large files, which could disrupt the user experience during critical tasks.
  • GitHub Authentication
    Utterances uses GitHub issues for comments, meaning users authenticate via GitHub. This can reduce spam and ensures that commenters have a verified identity.
  • Lightweight and Fast
    Utterances is designed to be lightweight and load quickly, benefiting site performance and user experience.
  • Markdown Support
    Since it leverages GitHub issues, users can write comments in Markdown, which many developers and technical users appreciate.
  • GitHub Integration
    Comments are managed through GitHub issues, making them easy to track, moderate, and integrate into your development workflow.
  • Open Source
    Utterances is open source, allowing developers to review the code, contribute, and customize it to their needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on GitHub
    Comments are entirely reliant on GitHub's infrastructure, which means any downtime or issues with GitHub services can affect the commenting system.
  • Limited to GitHub Users
    Only users with GitHub accounts can comment, which may exclude or discourage participation from users who are not developers or familiar with GitHub.
  • No Anonymity
    Because commenting requires a GitHub account, users cannot comment anonymously, which might be a drawback for some communities.
  • Moderation Complexity
    Moderating comments requires managing GitHub issues, which can be cumbersome compared to dedicated comment moderation tools.
  • Feature Limitations
    Utterances is relatively simple and lacks advanced features found in other commenting systems, like rich media support, voting, or detailed analytics.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Sejda
utterances

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Sejda is generally considered a good tool for PDF editing.

Why this product is good

  • User-Friendly Interface: Sejda offers an intuitive interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for users of all experience levels.
  • Comprehensive Features: It includes various features such as PDF editing, merging, splitting, compressing, converting, and protecting with passwords.
  • Cross-Platform Support: Sejda is available online and has desktop versions for both Windows and macOS, allowing flexibility in how you access its tools.
  • Free and Paid Options: Sejda offers a helpful free tier that allows users to perform tasks without a subscription, while the paid version unlocks additional features and removes usage limitations.
  • Fast and Efficient: Users often report that tasks are completed quickly and with minimal hassle.

Recommended for

  • Individuals who need to perform occasional PDF edits without installing heavy software.
  • Small businesses looking for an affordable PDF management solution.
  • Students who need a tool for editing and organizing academic materials.
  • Professionals requiring an efficient tool for document workflow.

Overall verdict

  • Utterances is generally considered a good option for integrating a commenting system.

Why this product is good

  • It is lightweight and doesn't add significant loading time to web pages.
  • Utterances uses GitHub issues to store comments, which integrates well for projects already using GitHub for version control.
  • Installation is straightforward, making it easy to implement on static sites, particularly those generated with Jekyll or Hugo.
  • The comments are stored on GitHub's infrastructure, which is reliable and robust.

Recommended for

  • Developers and bloggers already using GitHub for project hosting.
  • Technical blogs and sites generated with static site generators like Jekyll or Hugo.
  • Users who prefer a minimalistic and efficient commenting system over more feature-rich alternatives.
  • Those looking for an open-source, privacy-friendly commenting solution.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Sejda 2 videos + Add
utterances 1 video + Add

Sejda PDF Editor Tutorial

More videos

  • - Sejda Free PDF Tools~My Pick Of The Week & Free Shout Out

SEMANTICS-7: Utterances, Sentences & Propositions

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Sejda
utterances
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Sejda and utterances. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Sejda no reviews yet
utterances no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of utterances yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Sejda 6 mentions
utterances 53 mentions

View more

  • Adding Giscus Comments to Next.js Blog Pages
    Utterances: **The primary inspiration for giscus. It uses **GitHub Issues instead of Discussions to store comments. It is extremely lightweight but does not support threaded replies as natively as giscus. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • [TIL][Jekyll] Replacing Disqus with utterances for GitHub issue comments
    Title: [TIL][Jekyll] Removing Disqus and switching to utteranc to use github issue as article comments Published: false Date: 2021-05-14 00:00:00 UTC Tags: Canonical_url:... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
  • Add Utterances Comment System in Next.js App in App Router
    'use client'; Import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react'; Const Comments = ({ issueTerm }) => { const commentsSection = useRef(null); useEffect(() => { const script = document.createElement('script'); script.src =... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Sejda and utterances

When comparing Sejda and utterances, you can also consider the following products.