
Secureframe
Vanta
Drata
Sprinto
OneTrust
Probo
Apptega
Deel
Clearbit
Lusha
Apollo.io
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
Secureframe
ClearbitSecureframe is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized businesses, and enterprises seeking an efficient way to manage compliance obligations, particularly those in the technology, finance, and healthcare sectors that need to comply with strict security regulations.
No Secureframe videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Clearbit should be more popular than Secureframe. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Secureframe | Remote (Canada) | https://secureframe.com | 150-200k CAD Secureframe helps company get compliant and build trust with their customers. We do this by integrating in a companies core SaaS tools, ingesting data, and then displaying all misconfigurations that need to be remediated for a given security framework. Stack is Rails/React/Typescript/Postgres/Elasticsearch We've got three open engineering roles... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
My org is in a position where we'll need to get SOC II or ISO 27001 certified in the next year. I've been doing some research on the easiest way to go about this, and discovered secureframe (https://secureframe.com/). It looks like it is a platform that helps you automate/track some of the compliance tasks, but doesn't actually do the audit (they have partners that work through the platform). I'm wondering if... Source: over 3 years ago
Hi, founder of Secureframe (https://secureframe.com) here. Secureframe helps streamline compliance across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and more. There are so many accurate responses in this thread. Like many have mentioned, SOC 2 is indeed not a prescriptive framework. Much of the confusion behind SOC 2 stems from that fact. It allows you to customize your InfoSec program to your company's needs. As we know,... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Vanta - Automate compliance, simplify security.
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Drata - Put SOC 2 Compliance on Autopilot
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Sprinto - SOC 2 security compliance for SaaS
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.