Software Alternatives & Startups

Screenster VS Endtest

Compare Screenster VS Endtest and see what are their differences

Screenster

10x faster UI testing without a line of code.

Rating
0 reviews
Endtest

The agentic AI platform for end-to-end test automation.

Rating
4.5 · 2 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $175 / Monthly

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Endtest seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 10 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 10
Website Testing popularity
47% vs 53%
alternatives listed
160 vs 198

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Screenster
Endtest
Website screenster.io endtest.io
Pricing
Paid Free trial $175 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms —
Browser Android iOS Web REST API Google Chrome Firefox Edge Safari Internet Explorer +7
Company — Startup from the United States · 20 - 49 employees · 2016
Listed in

About Screenster and Endtest

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Screenster
Endtest

No description of Screenster yet.

Endtest is an agentic AI platform for end-to-end test automation that helps teams create, run, maintain, and scale automated tests faster, without writing code. It combines a low-code testing interface with AI agents that can generate editable tests, assist with maintenance, import tests from...

Read more about Endtest

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Screenster 5 features
Endtest 15 features
  • Ease of Use
    Screenster offers a user-friendly interface that allows users to easily navigate and set up their automated tests without needing extensive coding knowledge.
  • Visual Regression Testing
    Screenster provides robust visual regression testing capabilities, allowing you to detect any visual changes in your web applications effectively.
  • Cloud-Based
    Because it's a cloud-based solution, Screenster does not require any complex local setup, contributing to ease of accessibility and reduced maintenance.
  • Team Collaboration
    Screenster provides features that enhance team collaboration, such as shared test projects and dashboards for team visibility.
  • Smart Comparison Algorithms
    It features smart algorithms to compare screenshots accurately, which helps in flagging only the meaningful changes and reducing false positives.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing
    Screenster can be relatively expensive compared to some other test automation tools, especially for smaller businesses or individual developers.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    The platform may have limited support for various programming languages and integrations, confining more experienced developers who prefer custom scripting.
  • Dependency on Network
    Being a cloud-based solution means that it is highly dependent on network stability and speed, which might be a limitation in environments with poor connectivity.
  • Scalability
    As of the latest data, some users have reported that Screenster may not scale well for extremely large projects or enterprise-level testing requirements.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Scenarios
    While it's easy to use for basic tests, setting up complex testing scenarios can still have a learning curve, requiring additional time and effort to master.
  • AI Test Creation Agent
    Generate editable automated tests from plain-language instructions, files, or imported test definitions.
  • Codeless Test Automation
    Endtest allows users to create automated tests without writing any code, making it accessible to users with limited programming skills.
  • Cross-Browser Testing
    The platform supports cross-browser testing, allowing users to ensure their applications work on various browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • No-Code Test Automation
    Create, run, and maintain automated tests through an intuitive interface without writing code.
  • Self-Healing Tests
    Automatically recover from changed element locators to reduce broken tests and maintenance work.
  • Visual Testing
    Endtest offers visual testing capabilities which can automatically detect visual differences in the UI, helping to catch design-related issues.
  • Agentic AI Test Automation
    Use AI agents that can generate, adapt, and assist with automated tests across complex workflows.
  • AI Assertions
    Use AI to validate complex page content, behavior, or outcomes without writing detailed manual checks.
  • Email / SMS Testing
    Verify email and SMS flows such as signups, login codes, notifications, and confirmations.
  • PDF and File Testing
    Test file uploads, downloads, PDF content, and document-based workflows automatically.
  • Accessibility Testing
    Check applications for accessibility issues and help teams build more inclusive user experiences.
  • Geolocation Testing
    Run tests from different locations to validate localized content, regional behavior, and location-based flows.
  • Integration
    It supports integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, streamlining the deployment pipeline.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for users to navigate and set up their tests.
  • Cloud-Based
    Being a cloud-based solution, Endtest allows users to execute tests without needing local infrastructure, improving scalability and flexibility.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Screenster
Endtest

Overall verdict

  • Screenster is considered a good tool for teams looking to streamline their UI testing processes without investing heavily in manual testing or complex scripting. Its features are particularly beneficial for teams that need a quick setup and straightforward operation.

Why this product is good

  • Screenster is a cloud-based visual regression testing tool aimed at simplifying UI testing processes. It automatically captures and monitors visual changes in the UI over time, reducing the effort required to manually spot differences. The platform is designed to be user-friendly, supporting no-code test creation, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical team members. It integrates with CI/CD pipelines and supports cross-browser testing.

Recommended for

    Screenster is recommended for small to medium-sized development teams, QAs, or businesses that want to implement efficient UI testing without extensive overhead. It's also suitable for teams that need frequent UI updates and want to ensure visual consistency across different browsers.

Overall verdict

  • Endtest is considered a good choice for teams seeking a reliable and straightforward test automation solution, particularly those who prefer a codeless approach. Its ease of use, combined with a robust feature set, makes it well-suited for various testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Endtest is a user-friendly, codeless test automation tool that allows testers to create and execute tests without having to write complex code. It supports a wide range of platforms and technologies, which makes it versatile for most testing needs. It also offers features such as built-in test data management, parallel test execution, and integrations with CI/CD tools for streamlined workflows.

Recommended for

    Endtest is recommended for QA teams who are transitioning from manual to automated testing, organizations that lack extensive coding expertise within their testing teams, and companies that need to automate tests across multiple platforms quickly and efficiently.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Screenster 3 videos + Add
Endtest 3 videos + Add

Editing UI Tests with Screenster

More videos

  • - Toddy Screenster Hands-On Review
  • - Gmail visual testing automation with Screenster

Endtest Visual Testing

More videos

  • - Endtest Self-Healing Tests
  • - Endtest AI Test Creation Agent

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Screenster
Endtest
47% 47%
53% 53%
28% 28%
72% 72%
42% 42%
58% 58%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Screenster and Endtest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Screenster no reviews yet
Endtest 4.5 · 2 reviews

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Screenster 0 mentions
Endtest 10 mentions

Tracking Screenster since Mar 2021.

  • Looking for a Cheaper mabl Alternative? Here's What I'd Compare Before Renewing
    For that team, Endtest is a serious alternative. You get an AI-enabled, no-code testing platform with substantial overlap in the workflows that drive a typical regression suite. You can inspect its pricing without starting with a sales... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • How to Make Playwright Autonomous (Without Letting an AI Agent Run Wild)
    There are platforms that already package autonomous browser exploration with test creation and managed execution. Endtest is one example. Its Endtest Bot is designed to explore a web application and generate test scenarios, while the... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • Most CI Failures Are Environment Failures
    At Endtest, we have been working toward results that show the failed step, the surrounding logs, screenshots, and the information needed to investigate what happened. AI-assisted failure analysis can help suggest a likely cause, but it... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

View more

Alternatives to Screenster and Endtest

When comparing Screenster and Endtest, you can also consider the following products.