runc Reviews

0xProcessing Reviews

1. Barrie Grubb

   · Branch Manager at J & W Carpets · about 2 months ago
   Easy to fit into our existing process

   We were looking for a way to accept crypto payments with no changes to the rest of our workflow. After reviewing payment gateways, 0xProcessing was deemed more feasible than others. The setup was simple and once it ran, never required day-to-day attention. The ability to create payment requests is hassle-free and clear for daily transaction uses; hence, there is no confusion.

   🏁 Competitors: CoinGate, RIZON

   👍 Pros:    Quick to get started|Supports multiple cryptocurrencies|Simple payment request|Clear transaction status

   👎 Cons:    More detailed reporting would be useful|Dashboard customization is limited
2. Cimin Cohen

   · Founder and CEO at Idea Peddler · about 2 months ago
   The goal is to move BitPay in order to utilize it globally.

   Following numerous payment drops and unexpected compliance holds with BitPay, we switched our primary checkout flow to 0xProcessing. Our global clients rely on cross-border technology, services, and products. We needed a payment gateway that is used to handling payment processing and won’t raise flags about something this usual. Actually the onboarding as merchant was quite easy. The API integration into Vettrack’s custom billing stack has taken the dev team the best part of about two afternoons and the docs don’t leave much to the imagination.

   To run its day-to-day operations, Stable is used. We rely heavily on this payment links feature, which is completely automated. The VRCS feature converts incoming volatile assets to stablecoins automatically. The latter aspect alone has given adequate protection to our margins during the dips which get tied up in the afternoon. The 18 supported networks includes nearly everything our clients use. The processing time in so minimal, and we have still yet to have our first chargeback or false fraud flag since we started using it. The interface is effective but has glitches.

   🏁 Competitors: BitPay, CoinGate, RIZON, Coinbase

   👍 Pros:    Vrcs effectively mitigates market volatility risk|Supports a wide range of native tokens and|Transparent fee structure with no hidden billing surprises

   👎 Cons:    Ui dashboard feels overly basic for complex financial analysis|No native fiat payout options available
3. Ahsanul Hasan Amit

   · CEO and Founder at Dream Workers Tech · about 2 months ago
   A practical option for making crypto payments on occasion.

   Since we don't usually process such payments, we weren’t looking for one that was equipped with many sophisticated tools. The first things were reliability and setup that shouldn’t be hard to get used to.

   After looking at a number of options Fireblocks included we found 0xProcessing easier to work with. The on-boarding process was simple and the documentation covered the majority of our needs. It has been doing its job with no additional work since implementation.

   🏁 Competitors: CoinGate, Fireblocks, BitPay

   👍 Pros:    Straightforward on-boarding|Supports several networks|Easy to understand pricing

   👎 Cons:    Limited analytics|Few dashboard customization options

runc mentions (11)

• Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm

  For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers

  Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning

  Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products

  It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• Why did the Krustlet project die?

  Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 3 years ago

0xProcessing mentions (0)