
Django
Laravel
ASP.NET
ExpressJS
Flask
Node.js
CodeIgniter
Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Substack
Formo.so
Advanced analytics for Substack writers. Runs 100% locally, no cloud, no subscription. Discover your superfans, churn risk, and cohort retention.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Ruby on Rails seems to be a lot more popular than StackStats.app. While we know about 152 links to Ruby on Rails, we've tracked only 1 mention of StackStats.app.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | rubyonrails.org | stackstats.app |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United States | Startup from the United Arab Emirates · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


We recommend LibHunt Ruby for discovery and comparisons of trending Ruby projects. Also, to find more open-source ruby alternatives, you can check out libhunt.com/r/rails
StackStats is a local desktop app for serious Substack writers. Import your CSV exports and get analytics Substack doesn't show you: bot-filtered open rates, cohort retention, dead subscriber detection, superfan ID, content-to-growth correlation, and an optional AI layer (supports Ollama,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Ruby On Rails Biggest Waste Of Time In 2020 | Ruby on Rails Dead
More videos
No StackStats.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Ruby on Rails and StackStats.app.
StackStats.app's answer:
I built StackStats because Substack's native analytics weren't cutting it. I wanted cohort data, real open rates (not bot-inflated), and a way to identify which posts were actually driving subscriber growth — but every tool I found was either cloud-based or required migrating off Substack entirely. So I built a local app that works with Substack's own CSV exports. No migration, no cloud, no subscription.
StackStats.app's answer:
StackStats runs 100% locally on your machine — your subscriber data never touches a server. It also goes far beyond what Substack shows natively: bot-filtered open rates, cohort retention, superfan identification, dead subscriber detection, and content-to-growth correlation. No subscription, no account, no cloud. Pay once, own it forever.
StackStats.app's answer:
Most newsletter analytics tools are cloud-based SaaS with monthly subscriptions. StackStats is a one-time purchase that runs entirely on your device. For Substack writers who care about privacy — especially those with paid subscribers — that's a meaningful difference. You also get analytics features that don't exist anywhere else, like bot-filtered open rates and cohort retention, without having to migrate away from Substack.
StackStats.app's answer:
Serious Substack writers who are frustrated by Substack's shallow native analytics and want real data to drive growth — without moving their subscriber data to the cloud.
StackStats.app's answer:
Electron (macOS + Windows), HTML/CSS/JavaScript, Chart.js, PapaParse. Optional AI layer supports Ollama, Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Groq, and OpenRouter. Licensing via Cloudflare Workers + D1. Payments via Gumroad.
Share your experience with using Ruby on Rails and StackStats.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Yes, there are other more trending frameworks; however, nothing reaches the productivity of Rails. It's simply unbeatable if you have a small team. For example both SaaSHub and LibHunt were built on Rails.
The best frameworks for web development include React, Angular, Vue.js, Django, Spring, Laravel, Ruby on Rails, Flask and Express.js. Each of these frameworks has its own advantages and distinctive features, so it is...
In terms of documentation, guidelines, and libraries, Ruby on Rails is the superior framework for smaller applications. Since it entered the online scene before Laravel, its community is larger and more well-liked...
We have no reviews of StackStats.app yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


To use the same pattern based approach to validate a social security number (SSN) in Ruby:. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
Phoenix is a framework for Elixir, the same way Rails is a framework for Ruby. Its mission is to be a productive framework that doesn't compromise on speed or maintainability. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Laravel, Rails, and Django remain the most battle-tested full-stack frameworks in 2026. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
I'm working on 3 products now: 1. FormBeep(https://formbeep.com) at $38 MRR now - A form to Whatsapp tool. Stack is mainly CF workers with Clerk Auth. 2. SlashLink(https://slashlink.app) $0 - A simple pay as you go amazon link localizer.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
When comparing Ruby on Rails and StackStats.app, you can also consider the following products.

The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Compare Django to Ruby on Rails or StackStats.app:

With Substack, anyone can start a publication that combines a personal website, blog, and email newsletter or podcast. It's quick and simple.
Compare Substack to Ruby on Rails or StackStats.app:


Analytics and data platform for DeFi apps
Compare Formo.so to Ruby on Rails or StackStats.app:

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
Compare ASP.NET to Ruby on Rails or StackStats.app:

Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple
Compare ExpressJS to Ruby on Rails or StackStats.app: