
Airtable
NocoDB
Grist
Google Sheets
Baserow
Equals
Notion
The spreadsheet where teams work faster

Python
JavaScript
C++
Java
Perl
Lua
PHP
A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Rows should be more popular than Ruby. It has been mentioned 24 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | rows.com | ruby-lang.org |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from Germany · 10 - 19 employees · 2016 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Slick design. Built-in integrations. Revolutionary sharing. Rows reinvented spreadsheets so teams do more, crazy fast.
We recommend LibHunt Ruby for discovery and comparisons of trending Ruby projects.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Welcome to Rows
More videos
Ruby Programming Language - Full Course
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Rows and Ruby. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


You can bring your data to life. With Rows, you can jazz up your spreadsheets with slick charts, images, audio and even interactive features such as buttons and checkboxes. What’s more, you can share your spreadsheets...
With the growing popularity of Apple operating systems and applications, having Swift programming skills under your belt is a wise investment. Swift shares some similar characteristics with programming languages Ruby...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Alternatives were Rows and Airtable. Rows tends to be better at calculation, while Airtable tends to be better at storing and sorting data as a database. I was not aware of the open-source alternative called Baserow at the time. I did... Source: almost 3 years ago
[Baserow], [APITable], [Grist], and [Rowy] are all open source Airtable alternatives which offer hosted SaaS versions that include API access, though it's a bit difficult to compare the API rate limits across all these products.... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I have found rows.com recently, and im looking for a software to semi-automate my ppc reports (mostly facebook ads, but rarely google as well). Source: over 3 years ago
On Thursday, I shared the importance of contributing to Ruby's documentation, and I wanted to show that even a small contribution can help. Thus, I showed a small PR I submitted for the ruby-lang.org website:. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
The counter function is written in Ruby. Since Ruby is an interpreted language, AssemblyLift deploys a customized Ruby 3.1 interpreter compiled to WebAssembly, which executes the function handler. Since the interpreter is somewhat large,... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
But, in general I was told use rubyapi.org unless you _really_ want to stick with the ruby-lang.org docs for all you do (which is fine) or to dig more into some object hierarchy, etc. Source: over 4 years ago
When comparing Rows and Ruby, you can also consider the following products.

Airtable works like a spreadsheet but gives you the power of a database to organize anything. Sign up for free.
Compare Airtable to Rows or Ruby:

Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
Compare Python to Rows or Ruby:


Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
Compare JavaScript to Rows or Ruby:

Grist makes it easy to transform spreadsheets into a custom database where data is truly actionable.
Compare Grist to Rows or Ruby:

Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation
Compare C++ to Rows or Ruby: