Software Alternatives & Startups

RingCentral VS Heroku

Compare RingCentral VS Heroku and see what are their differences

RingCentral

RingCentral is the leading provider of cloud-based communications and collaboration solutions for small business and enterprise companies

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $19.99 / Monthly (All-in-One Phone, Team Messaging, and Video Conferencing.)
Heroku

Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Heroku seems to be a lot more popular than RingCentral. While we know about 74 links to Heroku, we've tracked only 3 mentions of RingCentral.

social mentions
3 vs 74
VoIP popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

RingCentral
Heroku
Website ringcentral.com heroku.com
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $19.99 / Monthly (All-in-One Phone, Team Messaging, and Video Conferencing.) Official pricing
Company Startup from the United States Startup from the United States
Listed in

About RingCentral and Heroku

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

RingCentral
Heroku

We work with our customers to reimagine the world of business communications and collaboration. This relentless passion to innovate has made us the #1 cloud communications provider worldwide, and we don’t plan on stopping there. Technology breaks down barriers and unlocks potential, making it...

Read more about RingCentral

No description of Heroku yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

RingCentral 5 features
Heroku 6 features
  • Comprehensive Features
    RingCentral offers a wide range of features, including voice, video, messaging, and collaboration tools, making it a one-stop solution for communication needs.
  • Scalability
    The platform is highly scalable, allowing businesses of all sizes to adapt the service to their needs without compromising on functionality or performance.
  • Easy Integration
    RingCentral seamlessly integrates with numerous third-party applications like Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and Salesforce, enhancing overall productivity.
  • Reliable Uptime
    RingCentral offers a robust and reliable service with high uptime, ensuring that communication channels are consistently available.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to navigate and manage their communication needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    RingCentral's pricing can be higher compared to other communication platforms, which might be a concern for smaller businesses on a tight budget.
  • Complex Setup
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the initial setup and configuration can be complex for users who are not tech-savvy.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow and not always helpful, which can be problematic in resolving urgent issues.
  • Limited Customization
    While RingCentral offers a lot of features, there is limited scope for customization to tailor the service exactly to unique business needs.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Users have occasionally experienced glitches and performance issues, particularly during peak usage times.
  • Ease of Use
    Heroku offers an extremely user-friendly interface and a high level of abstraction, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment
    One of Heroku’s strongest points is the ability to deploy applications quickly using Git. Developers can push their code to Heroku with a simple command, streamlining the entire process.
  • Scalability
    Heroku provides effortless scaling options by allowing developers to add more dynos (containers) with a single command to handle increased traffic and workload.
  • Add-Ons Ecosystem
    Heroku offers a rich ecosystem of add-ons, such as databases, caching, monitoring, and more, which can be easily integrated into applications to extend their functionality.
  • Automatic Updates
    Heroku automatically handles operating system and server updates, allowing developers to focus solely on their application code rather than maintenance tasks.
  • Free Tier
    Heroku offers a free tier with sufficient resources to host small projects and learn the platform without incurring costs, making it accessible for beginners and small-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    While Heroku offers a free tier, the costs can quickly add up for larger applications and professional use. Paid plans and additional dynos or add-ons can become expensive.
  • Performance
    Heroku’s performance can sometimes be suboptimal compared to other cloud providers, particularly when running high-performance or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Control
    Heroku abstracts away a lot of infrastructure management, which can be a downside for developers who need fine-grained control over their environments and configurations.
  • Dyno Sleeping
    Applications running on Heroku’s free tier experience 'dyno sleeping,' where the application goes to sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, causing a delay when it wakes up after receiving a new request.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Heroku’s ecosystem and platform-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another platform if needed.
  • Add-On Costs
    The costs for add-ons can also become significant, as many useful features and integrations require paid add-ons, increasing the overall expense.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

RingCentral
Heroku

Overall verdict

  • Overall, RingCentral is a reputable and effective communication platform that meets the needs of modern businesses looking for an all-in-one solution. While it may be more expensive than some alternatives, the range of features and overall performance justify the cost for many users.

Why this product is good

  • RingCentral is considered a solid choice for cloud-based communication solutions due to its comprehensive suite of features that include voice, video, messaging, and collaboration tools. The platform is known for its reliability, scalability, and ease of integration with other business applications. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and strong customer support, making it suitable for businesses of various sizes.

Recommended for

    RingCentral is particularly recommended for small to large businesses seeking an integrated communication and collaboration platform. It is ideal for companies with remote teams who require a reliable, unified system that supports mobile and desktop use. Additionally, businesses looking for advanced features like video conferencing, call center management, and CRM integrations will find RingCentral highly beneficial.

Overall verdict

  • Heroku is a solid choice for developers seeking a straightforward, cloud-based solution for deploying and managing applications. However, it may not be the most cost-effective option for large-scale or data-intensive applications.

Why this product is good

  • Heroku is a popular platform as a service (PaaS) due to its ease of use, fast deployment process, and robust support for multiple programming languages. It allows developers to focus on building applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. Heroku offers scaling capabilities, a wide variety of add-ons, and a strong developer community.

Recommended for

    Heroku is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized applications, hobby projects, and developers who value ease of use and quick deployment cycles. It is particularly suited for those who are developing web applications in languages such as Ruby, Node.js, Python, and others supported by the platform.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

RingCentral 2 videos + Add
Heroku 2 videos + Add

RingCentral Review: Getting Started Demo & Tutorial

More videos

  • - RingCentral VOIP Phone System Review 2020 - RingCentral reviews 2020

What is Heroku | Ask a Dev Episode 14

More videos

  • - Heroku review

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
RingCentral
Heroku
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using RingCentral and Heroku. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

RingCentral no reviews yet
Heroku 4.5 · 2 reviews

View more

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

RingCentral 3 mentions
Heroku 74 mentions
  • Small Business help
    Systems like 8x8/RingCentral/Vonage or even Voip.ms might be ideal for you. Source: about 5 years ago
  • Which international call tracking software ?
    I saw www.calltrackingmetrics.com ; ringcentral.com ; twilio.com ; Zadarma. At this moment it seems that calltrackingmetrics seems to be the first solution I would try because they put in front of their ads the fact to track with google... Source: over 5 years ago
  • Business Phone Number: Need Help
    I use unitelvoice.com. It works fine has an app and can forward to my cell number. Used to use ringcentral.com it was fine when it worked but support was crap. Source: over 5 years ago

View more

Alternatives to RingCentral and Heroku

When comparing RingCentral and Heroku, you can also consider the following products.