Reviewable
Atlassian Crucible
CodeRabbit
Review Board
Phabricator
Gerrit Code Review
MergeBoard
GitHub
RealityGraph.dev
CodeRabbit
SonarSource
Aikido Security
Review Assistant
Reality Graph is the context, validation, and evidence layer for AI-assisted software development. The problem: tools like Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot generate code faster than teams can understand and review it โ creating verification debt. Reality Graph doesn't replace these tools; it structures the workflow around them: Task Contracts make goals and done-criteria explicit and checkable before the run, Context Packs deliver focused instead of noisy context, the Validation Map ties every change to tests and risks, and the Evidence Trail records what changed and what was checked. Everything runs local-first โ source code never leaves your machine. Advisory by default, no autonomous commits. Built in Berlin, currently in private closed beta.
Reviewable RealityGraph.devNo features have been listed yet.
No RealityGraph.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Reviewable seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Reviewable.io โ Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Atlassian Crucible - Collaborative peer code review tool.
CodeRabbit - Unleash AI on Your Code Reviews with CodeRabbit
SonarSource - Sonar empowers developers and organizations to achieve Clean Code, systematically and predictably.
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes
Aikido Security - Secure your code, cloud, and runtime in one central system. Find and fix vulnerabilities fast and automatically.
Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator