
User Interviews
UserTesting.com
Qualaroo
Netigate
Poll Everywhere
ARCS
Zappi
Respondent helps you find any target audience in the world for in-person and remote research studies across all research methods including interviews, focus groups, surveys, and more. Respondent works with any research tool you already use.

Cursor
warp by spolu
GitHub Copilot
Google Antigravity
opencode
Codex 3.0 by OpenAI
Windsurf Editor
Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebase—no more context switching, just breakthrough results.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Respondent seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 23 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | respondent.io | anthropic.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Respondent yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Respondent Review - High Paying or BS? (Inside Look)
More videos
Claude Code Replaced Cursor for Me… Here’s Why
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Respondent and Claude Code. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Respondent – Online and in-person consumer research studies w/ average pay rates of $140 an hour! Check out our full Respondent review for more.
I just purchased 20 bucks package of claude and now its working as a full time employee for me.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Respondent.io is great as well. Lots and lots of studies every day posted, these can pay very well depending on your specialty. Source: almost 3 years ago
Hi! No, this is a legitimate project. You can visit our website respondent.io to know more about the company. Thank you! Source: about 3 years ago
If you have a bit more budget, you can also recruit participants from online panels (like userinterviews.com or respondent.io). For an incentive, you can screen the right people to participate in your playtest. Keep in mind you will need... Source: over 3 years ago
Tracking Claude Code since May 2025.
When comparing Respondent and Claude Code, you can also consider the following products.

User Interviews is a tool to recruit participants for product tests and market research.
Compare User Interviews to Respondent or Claude Code:

The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.
Compare Cursor to Respondent or Claude Code:

Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!
Compare UserTesting.com to Respondent or Claude Code:

Secure and simple terminal sharing
Compare warp by spolu to Respondent or Claude Code:

Qualaroo makes it easy to survey specific groups of website visitors to gain qualitative information.
Compare Qualaroo to Respondent or Claude Code:

Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.
Compare GitHub Copilot to Respondent or Claude Code: