
Vite
React
Next.js
Node.js
Tailwind CSS
Webpack
Redux.js
Quick in-browser prototyping for React Components!

Material UI
Bootstrap
Ant Design
Material Me
Materialize CSS
Ant Design System for Figma
Design Systems Repo
A beautiful graphics framework for Material Design in Swift

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, React.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 194 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | react.dev | github.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
It is recommended for developers of all levels who are working with or interested in React. Beginners can benefit from the structured tutorials and foundational information, while experienced developers can find advanced topics and the latest developments in the React ecosystem.
No analysis of Material yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No React.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Material Review Board
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using React.run and Material. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of React.run yet. Be the first one to post
Like the Material UI, Materialize is also designed based on Google’s Material Design. This responsive framework works with great speed, and the concentration is specified on building awesome user-experience.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


It’s already been captured. Check out the docs for creating a new React app on react.dev: https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app It throws you straight at Next.js. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> The train of thought is “what is everyone using? I’ll use that too” I'm not so sure about that. We're seeing Next.js being pushed as the successor of create-react-app even in react.dev[1], which as a premise is kind of stupid. There is... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
The React documentation is infamously responsible of recommending Next as a "default". After a lot of backlash it got somewhat toned down, but it's still the first thing they suggest[1] for creating a new app [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Tracking Material since Mar 2021.
When comparing React.run and Material, you can also consider the following products.


A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design
Compare Material UI to React.run or Material:


Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
Compare Bootstrap to React.run or Material:

A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Compare Next.js to React.run or Material:

An enterprise-class UI design language and React implementation with a set of high-quality React components, one of best React UI library for enterprises
Compare Ant Design to React.run or Material: