
Vite
React
Next.js
Node.js
Tailwind CSS
Redux.js
Create React App
Quick in-browser prototyping for React Components!

Scrimba
Codédex
GoIT LMS
Codelita
Data Protocol
codedamn
Codecademy
Programming exercises for experienced engineers.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, React.run seems to be a lot more popular than CodeCrafters. While we know about 194 links to React.run, we've tracked only 11 mentions of CodeCrafters.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | react.dev | codecrafters.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
It is recommended for developers of all levels who are working with or interested in React. Beginners can benefit from the structured tutorials and foundational information, while experienced developers can find advanced topics and the latest developments in the React ecosystem.
No analysis of CodeCrafters yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No React.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Learn to Build Real Software With CodeCrafters
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using React.run and CodeCrafters. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


It’s already been captured. Check out the docs for creating a new React app on react.dev: https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app It throws you straight at Next.js. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> The train of thought is “what is everyone using? I’ll use that too” I'm not so sure about that. We're seeing Next.js being pushed as the successor of create-react-app even in react.dev[1], which as a premise is kind of stupid. There is... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
The React documentation is infamously responsible of recommending Next as a "default". After a lot of backlash it got somewhat toned down, but it's still the first thing they suggest[1] for creating a new app [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Sometime ago, I decided to embark on a new endeavor, I was curious about how shell works, and came across the the codecrafters.io build your own shell challenge, and thought this is a good opportunity for me to learn shell, as well as... - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
Submitting with git push also exists at CodeCrafters, for code you write from scratch. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
I had a lot of with Code Crafters. It's a paid platform, but they give you a basic walk through of different technologies, with full test suites. For example, you implement some basic Redis. It doesn't spoon feed you what to do, but... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
When comparing React.run and CodeCrafters, you can also consider the following products.


Interactive coding screencasts created in an instant
Compare Scrimba to React.run or CodeCrafters:



A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Compare Next.js to React.run or CodeCrafters:
Empowering emerging markets with high-quality tech education
Compare GoIT LMS to React.run or CodeCrafters: