
Vite
React
Next.js
Node.js
Tailwind CSS
Redux.js
Create React App
Quick in-browser prototyping for React Components!

Arena Tutor
MTG Arena Tool
Untapped.gg
MTGA Tracker
MTGA Pro Tracker
MTGMelee
The 17Lands Client uploads the Magic The Gathering Arena draft logs to the 17Lands website.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, React.run should be more popular than 17Lands Client. It has been mentioned 194 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | react.dev | 17lands.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
It is recommended for developers of all levels who are working with or interested in React. Beginners can benefit from the structured tutorials and foundational information, while experienced developers can find advanced topics and the latest developments in the React ecosystem.
No analysis of 17Lands Client yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using React.run and 17Lands Client. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


It’s already been captured. Check out the docs for creating a new React app on react.dev: https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app It throws you straight at Next.js. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> The train of thought is “what is everyone using? I’ll use that too” I'm not so sure about that. We're seeing Next.js being pushed as the successor of create-react-app even in react.dev[1], which as a premise is kind of stupid. There is... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
The React documentation is infamously responsible of recommending Next as a "default". After a lot of backlash it got somewhat toned down, but it's still the first thing they suggest[1] for creating a new app [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Getting an average of 2-3 wins in Quick Draft is fairly decent for a new drafter. If you think you're learning at all, it's worth sticking with it to get better. You should be able to learn the fastest when you're starting out. In... Source: over 3 years ago
The best thing to identify the best cards from fillers and bad cards is watcing the win rate stats in 17lands.com. Source: over 3 years ago
17lands.com has huge amount of data on every limited format that is available on Arena. Source: over 3 years ago
When comparing React.run and 17Lands Client, you can also consider the following products.


The best MTG Arena tracker and draft assistant. Uses AI to optimize your drafting and playing.
Compare Arena Tutor to React.run or 17Lands Client:

A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
Compare React to React.run or 17Lands Client:

Collection browser, a deck tracker and a statistics manager.
Compare MTG Arena Tool to React.run or 17Lands Client:

A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Compare Next.js to React.run or 17Lands Client:

Online deck tracker & analytics for Magic: The Gathering Arena
Compare Untapped.gg to React.run or 17Lands Client: