Quantive VS onpath

onpath's answer:

Most goal tools only pay off once a whole company has rolled out a method. onpath starts with one goal and helps you work out how to reach it.

• Planned with an AI agent. The agent drafts the plan with you on a shared canvas, in the method that fits your goal: OKR, KPI tree, OGSM or one of seven others.
• People and agents on one plan. Every part of the plan has an owner. AI agents can take on parts of the work, and a person always stays accountable.
• Live numbers. Metrics flow in from the tools you already use, and progress calculates itself.
• Drift you see early. onpath compares progress with where the plan should be today, so you can change course while there is still time.

onpath's answer:

Choose onpath if you want to start with one goal instead of a company-wide OKR rollout.

• No rollout, no consultant. You can start today, and you don't need to know a planning method in advance because the agent suggests one.
• Numbers instead of Friday slides. Data comes in from your CRM, warehouse or automation tools through Zapier, Make, n8n or the Ingestion API.
• AI with real context. Through MCP, assistants like Claude or ChatGPT work with your actual goals and owners rather than a pasted summary.
• Your data stays in the EU.

If you need a suite for thousands of employees with performance reviews and HR processes built in, a larger OKR platform will probably suit you better.

onpath's answer:

People who own a goal that several teams have to deliver together, and who are tired of plans living in slide decks while the numbers sit somewhere else.

• Team leads, chiefs of staff, heads of operations and RevOps in growing B2B companies with roughly 50 to 500 employees. Most of them already use AI at work.
• Consultants and fractional COOs who run goal work with their clients and want to leave behind something that keeps working.

onpath's answer:

For more than twenty years I built products and revenue engines for B2B companies, and I kept seeing the same pattern. Product followed one framework, marketing another, operations built its own dashboards, and nothing quite fitted together. The plan said "on track" until it suddenly didn't.

At 50+, I decided to work on that problem myself. onpath started as a Miro template and a question: why does every team invent its own way of setting goals and measuring progress? I built the product as a solo founder with AI agents at my side every day, from the first prototype to payments, infrastructure and security tests.

The way onpath was built is also the way it is meant to be used: people and AI agents working toward one goal, each with a clear role.