Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Quantive VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Quantive VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Quantive

The best platform for turning strategy into results.

Quantive Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial
Is it good? Alternatives
CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Is it good? Alternatives
ReleasePad
Changelog software that turns GitHub commits into release notes your users actually see — inside your app. Built for founders and teams who ship fast. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 6
Goal Setting And OKRs popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
219 vs 182

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Quantive
CrossBrowserTesting
Website quantive.com crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing
Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Official pricing
Company 2018 —
Listed in
Employee Performance Management Goal Setting And OKRs Project Management HR +1
Website Testing Browser Testing Automated Testing Project Management +1

About Quantive and CrossBrowserTesting

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Quantive
CrossBrowserTesting

Quantive is the world’s leading Strategy Execution Platform based on the OKR management methodology. By embedding strategic context, priorities, and progress into the day-to-day, Quantive creates organizations that excel at execution. With over 2,000 global customers across enterprises,...

Read more about Quantive

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Quantive 7 features
CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
  • OKR Management
  • Whiteboards
  • KPIs
  • Check-Ins
  • Tasks & Projects
  • Insight Boards
  • 160+ Integrations
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Quantive
CrossBrowserTesting

No analysis of Quantive yet.

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Quantive 2 videos + Add
CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add

Gtmhub Demo for TBG

More videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Quantive
CrossBrowserTesting
100% 100%
Goal Setting And OKRs
0% 0%
0% 0%
Website Testing
100% 100%
66% 66%
Project Management
34% 34%
0% 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Quantive and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Quantive no reviews yet
CrossBrowserTesting no reviews yet

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Quantive 0 mentions
CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions

Tracking Quantive since Mar 2021.

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Quantive and CrossBrowserTesting

When comparing Quantive and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...