Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

QB64 VS Aurel Basic

Compare QB64 VS Aurel Basic and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

QB64 logo QB64

Development

Aurel Basic logo Aurel Basic

Aurel Basic is basic-like programming language. Able to produce GUI Win32 programs.
  • QB64 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05
  • Aurel Basic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-28

QB64 features and specs

  • Compatibility
    QB64 maintains compatibility with QBasic and QuickBASIC code, allowing users to run legacy programs without modification.
  • Cross-Platform
    QB64 is available on major operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility to developers.
  • Modern Enhancements
    Incorporates modern features such as improved graphics, sound support, and networking capabilities beyond what was possible in the original QBasic.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, QB64 encourages community involvement, transparency, and contributions to the codebase.
  • Ease of Use
    Retains a simple, user-friendly interface that is accessible to beginners while providing powerful features for advanced users.

Possible disadvantages of QB64

  • Performance
    While optimized for modern systems, QB64 can be slower than more contemporary programming languages, particularly for complex applications.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    QB64 lacks the extensive library support and community resources available to more popular languages like Python or Java.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Users familiar with original QBasic may find it challenging to adapt to the newer, advanced features without proper documentation.
  • Niche Use Case
    Its primary appeal is for legacy support and nostalgia, which limits its application in modern, large-scale software development.
  • Legacy Language Constraints
    QB64 inherits some limitations of BASIC, such as less structured programming paradigms, which can impact code clarity and maintainability.

Aurel Basic features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

QB64 videos

+ Add

✅ Trying out QB64 v1.5 with my little platform game - Day 7

More videos:

  • Review - QB64 Report - S01E02 - SCREEN modes
  • Review - Old man Nick tries coding QB/QB64?

Aurel Basic videos

+ Add

Aurel Basic

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QB64 and Aurel Basic)

QB64

Aurel Basic

Programming Language
72 72%
Programming Language
28% 28
IDE
72 72%
IDE
28% 28
Text Editors
68 68%
Text Editors
32% 32
Game Engine
100 100%
Game Engine
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using QB64 and Aurel Basic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QB64 and Aurel Basic, you can also consider the following products

PureBasic - Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

FreeBASIC - FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...

Xojo - Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.

B4J - 100% free development tool for cross platform desktop and server apps.

PowerBASIC - PowerBASIC, formerly Turbo Basic, is the brand of several commercial compilers by PowerBASIC Inc.

Liberty BASIC - Easy Programming for Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7, 8 and 10

Loading...