Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PowerBASIC VS QB64

Compare PowerBASIC VS QB64 and see what are their differences

PowerBASIC logo PowerBASIC

PowerBASIC, formerly Turbo Basic, is the brand of several commercial compilers by PowerBASIC Inc.

QB64 logo QB64

Development
  • PowerBASIC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-18
  • QB64 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05

PowerBASIC features and specs

  • Performance
    PowerBASIC compiles to highly optimized machine code, resulting in fast and efficient executables with minimal overhead.
  • Compact Executables
    The language is known for creating small and compact executables which are beneficial for performance and memory usage, especially in resource-constrained environments.
  • Legacy Support
    It is well-suited for maintaining and updating legacy BASIC applications, providing continuity for long-standing projects.
  • Low-Level Programming
    PowerBASIC offers direct access to system hardware and memory manipulation, which can be a significant advantage for system programmers.
  • Ease of Use
    The syntax is relatively straightforward, especially for those already familiar with BASIC, reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of PowerBASIC

  • Limited Modern Features
    PowerBASIC lacks some of the modern programming constructs and libraries that are available in more contemporary programming languages.
  • Platform Limitations
    Primarily designed for Windows, PowerBASIC does not offer native support for other platforms, limiting cross-platform development capabilities.
  • Smaller User Community
    The user community for PowerBASIC is smaller compared to more popular languages, which can lead to fewer resources for support and collaboration.
  • Proprietary Nature
    As a proprietary product, PowerBASIC may involve licensing fees and does not offer the open-source flexibility that some developers prefer.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    The development and release of updates are less frequent compared to more mainstream programming environments, potentially impacting feature availability and bug fixes.

QB64 features and specs

  • Compatibility
    QB64 maintains compatibility with QBasic and QuickBASIC code, allowing users to run legacy programs without modification.
  • Cross-Platform
    QB64 is available on major operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility to developers.
  • Modern Enhancements
    Incorporates modern features such as improved graphics, sound support, and networking capabilities beyond what was possible in the original QBasic.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, QB64 encourages community involvement, transparency, and contributions to the codebase.
  • Ease of Use
    Retains a simple, user-friendly interface that is accessible to beginners while providing powerful features for advanced users.

Possible disadvantages of QB64

  • Performance
    While optimized for modern systems, QB64 can be slower than more contemporary programming languages, particularly for complex applications.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    QB64 lacks the extensive library support and community resources available to more popular languages like Python or Java.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Users familiar with original QBasic may find it challenging to adapt to the newer, advanced features without proper documentation.
  • Niche Use Case
    Its primary appeal is for legacy support and nostalgia, which limits its application in modern, large-scale software development.
  • Legacy Language Constraints
    QB64 inherits some limitations of BASIC, such as less structured programming paradigms, which can impact code clarity and maintainability.

PowerBASIC videos

PowerBasic demos - MSXturboR/GFX9000 - 1994

QB64 videos

✅ Trying out QB64 v1.5 with my little platform game - Day 7

More videos:

  • Review - QB64 Report - S01E02 - SCREEN modes
  • Review - Old man Nick tries coding QB/QB64?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PowerBASIC and QB64)
Programming Language
63 63%
37% 37
IDE
63 63%
37% 37
Text Editors
63 63%
37% 37
OOP
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PowerBASIC and QB64. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PowerBASIC and QB64, you can also consider the following products

PureBasic - Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

Xojo - Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.

FreeBASIC - FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...

Liberty BASIC - Easy Programming for Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7, 8 and 10

B4J - 100% free development tool for cross platform desktop and server apps.

thinBasic - thinBasic is a simple, flexible, and easy-to-learn interpreted programming language.