Software Alternatives & Startups

PullRequest.com VS FastComments

Compare PullRequest.com VS FastComments and see what are their differences

PullRequest.com

Code review as a service

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly (for individual developers)
FastComments

A very fast, feature-full, and privacy-focused comment service for handling discussions on the internet. At 4.6 kB with no dependencies, it's the fastest comment service around.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, FastComments should be more popular than PullRequest.com. It has been mentioned 7 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 7
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
74 vs 44

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PullRequest.com
FC
FastComments
Website pullrequest.com fastcomments.com
Pricing
Open source Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly (for individual developers) Official pricing
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python +17
—
Listed in

About PullRequest.com and FastComments

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

PullRequest.com
FC
FastComments

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

Read more about PullRequest.com

No description of FastComments yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PullRequest.com 5 features
FC
FastComments 6 features
  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.
  • Real-time Commenting
    FastComments offers real-time commenting features, allowing users to engage in dynamic conversations without needing to refresh the page.
  • Spam Filtering
    The platform includes robust spam filtering capabilities to maintain the quality and relevance of discussions.
  • Customizability
    FastComments provides various customization options, enabling website owners to tailor the commenting system's appearance and functionalities to match their site's design and requirements.
  • User Engagement
    Features like notifications, upvotes, and social integrations enhance user engagement by fostering interactive and community-driven discussions.
  • Embedding Options
    It allows for easy embedding of the commenting system on any site, providing flexibility and ease of use.
  • Moderation Tools
    The platform includes comprehensive moderation tools that empower admins to manage comments efficiently and maintain community standards.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    While it offers free plans, some advanced features and higher usage limits are behind a paywall, which might not be economical for all users.
  • Learning Curve
    The wide array of customization and features could present a steep learning curve for new users not familiar with comment management systems.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on a third-party service may introduce risk, as changes or outages in FastComments can impact the commenting system on your site.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Users and site owners may have concerns regarding data privacy and how user comments and data are handled by a third-party service.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Since it is primarily an online service, there may be limitations in accessing or managing comments when offline.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PullRequest.com
FC
FastComments
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using PullRequest.com and FastComments. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

PullRequest.com 2 mentions
FC
FastComments 7 mentions
  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code... Source: about 5 years ago
  • Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (April 2026)
    I'm working on Watch.ly - a remote human-in-the-loop networking and FS sandbox for AI agents like openclaw: https://watch.ly/ Also this week launching https://dirtforever.net/ which is an open alternative to RaceNet Clubs for Dirt Rally... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: What are you working on (August 2024)?
    Hello! This year I've been working on building an integrated registration and live timing platform [0] for my local organizers in CA, but it is spreading. Very fun/rewarding project. I hope to launch my own cellular-based timing hardware... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Commenting system for Hugo
    Another one I can recommend enthusiastically but forgot to mention before, is a paid service called FastComments (https://fastcomments.com/). Great, non-heavy code with a super-helpful developer. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to PullRequest.com and FastComments

When comparing PullRequest.com and FastComments, you can also consider the following products.