Software Alternatives & Reviews

Codacy VS PullRequest.com

Compare Codacy VS PullRequest.com and see what are their differences

Codacy logo Codacy

Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service
  • Codacy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis without the hassle.

  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

PullRequest.com

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

Codacy videos

Using Codacy for automated code reviews

More videos:

PullRequest.com videos

No PullRequest.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Codacy and PullRequest.com)
Code Coverage
93 93%
7% 7
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0
Code Quality
94 94%
6% 6

User comments

Share your experience with using Codacy and PullRequest.com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Codacy and PullRequest.com

Codacy Reviews

Ten Best SonarQube alternatives in 2021
Codacy automates code opinions and monitors code quality on each sprint. The main issues it covers concern code style, best practices, and security. In addition, it monitors adjustments in code insurance, code duplication, and code complexity. She was saving developers time in code opinions, consequently successfully tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala,...
Source: duecode.io

PullRequest.com Reviews

We have no reviews of PullRequest.com yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Codacy should be more popular than PullRequest.com. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Codacy mentions (4)

  • What is the best way to set a cookie (without setcookie?)
    I'm trying to use Codacy to review my code. One of the issues is regarding the use of the "setcookie" function. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Converting vstest coverage files in github actions?
    Does anyone have an example on how to get this conversion done on github actions where I can convert the *.coverage file into a *.xml file for uploading to codacy.com. Source: over 2 years ago
  • PHP Static Analysis Tools Review
    Online analysisFinally, if you want a simple way to analyze your code without having to manually configure everything locally, you can use an online code review service such as Codacy (shameless plug here). We already integrate some of the mentioned detection tools in this article and we are working every day to improve the service. The other main benefit of using automated code review tools is to allow you to... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Top 10 ways to perform fast code reviews
    Because you care and because you always want to be better, automation is a great way to optimize your review workflow process. Go ahead and do a quick search on Google for automated code reviews and see who better fits your workflow. You'll find Codacy on your Google search and we hope you like what we do. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Codacy and PullRequest.com, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

CodeStream - CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE

CodeFactor.io - Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review