Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PullRequest.com VS authzed

Compare PullRequest.com VS authzed and see what are their differences

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service

authzed logo authzed

The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

  • authzed Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-22

PullRequest.com

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

authzed features and specs

  • Fine-Grained Access Control
    Authzed provides fine-grained access control via its Zanau authorization system, allowing for highly specific permissions and access rules tailored to complex requirements.
  • Scalability
    Authzed is designed to handle large-scale applications and supports millions of users and permissions scenarios efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Authzed offers an open-source approach with SpiceDB, allowing developers to contribute and adapt the platform to their specific needs while benefiting from community support.
  • API-Driven
    The platform is API-driven, offering seamless integration with existing systems and technologies, making it easier for developers to incorporate into their architectures.
  • Cloud-Native
    Designed for modern cloud environments, Authzed supports cloud-native development practices, such as containerization and microservices architectures.

Possible disadvantages of authzed

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its detailed and customizable features, there is a steep learning curve associated with implementing Authzed, which may require more time and resources initially.
  • Complexity
    The system's capability for fine-grained permissions can add complexity to integration and management, potentially complicating simpler authorization needs.
  • Documentation Depth
    While improvements are continuously made, the documentation might not be as comprehensive or beginner-friendly as some users require, potentially complicating onboarding for new users.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Utilizing Authzed as an external service may introduce dependencies and concerns about service stability, uptime, and third-party management.
  • Early Stage
    As a relatively new entrant in the authorization space, some potential users may be hesitant to adopt Authzed due to concerns over the maturity and long-term support of the platform.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PullRequest.com and authzed)
Developer Tools
42 42%
58% 58
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
100% 100
Tech
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PullRequest.com and authzed. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, authzed should be more popular than PullRequest.com. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: about 5 years ago

authzed mentions (9)

  • Open Policy Agent
    Https://docs.opal.ac/ Universally, people I've met and worked with (20-30) hate writing rego (OPA). I'm always skeptical of Styra's analysis; they are literally selling you something. AuthZed looks interesting and they have good "ride along" videos in YouTube, e.g. Replicating GitHub auth. https://authzed.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Understanding Google Zanzibar and Why Shines at Building Permissions
    Plugging another company that's been implementing Google-Zanzibar-like auth tech: https://authzed.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • The developerโ€™s guide to IAM buzzwords
    Leading Authorization services include: โ Permit.io, AuthZed, Ory Keto, Styra DAS. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Permissions (access control) in web apps
    Https://authzed.com/ (Provider) AuthZed brings a specialized SpiceDB permissions database which they use as a centralized place for storing and managing rules. Then, you can use their SDKs to query, store, and validate application permissions. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2022)
    Authzed (YC W21) | Senior Site-Reliability Engineer (SRE) | NYC, Remote USA | Full-Time | https://authzed.com/ 20 milliseconds at the 99.5 percentile and five-nines (99.999) of uptime. Those are our goals for our globally-distributed permissions system as a service. If youโ€™re interested in helping us achieve these goals, we would like to talk. Weโ€™re currently using best-in-class open source solutions on the public... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PullRequest.com and authzed, you can also consider the following products

CodeRabbit - Unleash AI on Your Code Reviews with CodeRabbit

Cerbos - Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Aserto - Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Warrant - Authorization and access control infrastructure for developers