Warrant
authzed
Cerbos
Aserto
Oso
Ory
Supabase
Permify
PullRequest.com
CodeRabbit
Codacy
codebeat
Refactor.io
CodeStream
Codementor
Code Review by Codementor
PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.
Warrant PullRequest.comNo PullRequest.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Warrant seems to be a lot more popular than PullRequest.com. While we know about 22 links to Warrant, we've tracked only 2 mentions of PullRequest.com. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I think one major difference between the Zanzibar implementations that are out there is support for the 'zookie' consistency token (as mentioned in the original paper). OpenFGA afaik doesn't implement zookies yet[1]. With zookies, each permission write generates a unique token that represents that particular write. Clients can store that token (per resource) and optionally provide it during runtime checks to... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Warrant โ Hosted enterprise-grade authorization and access control service for your apps. The free tier includes 1 million monthly API requests and 1,000 authz rules. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
The specific challenge with authz in the app layer is that different apps can have different access models with varying complexity, especially the more granular you get (e.g. Implementing fine grained access to specific objects/resources - like Google Docs). Personally, I think a rebac (relationship/graph based) approach works best for apps because permissions in applications are mostly relational and/or... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Let's use warrant.dev as an example. The system provides a set of REST APIs for you to define object types and access policies (called warrants). The general process is first to create object types using HTTP POST:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Https://warrant.dev/ (Provider) Relatively new authZ provider, they have a dashboard where you can manage your rules in a central location and then use them from multiple languages via their SDKs, even on the client to perform UI checks. Rules can also be managed programmatically via SDK. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: about 5 years ago
authzed - The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions
CodeRabbit - Unleash AI on Your Code Reviews with CodeRabbit
Cerbos - Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
Aserto - Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes
codebeat - Automated code review for Swift