Project Include VS git-sizer

• Comprehensive Guidance
  Project Include provides detailed frameworks and recommendations for implementing diversity and inclusion (D&I) in tech companies, making it easier for organizations to take actionable steps.
• Community Driven
  The initiative is community-based, drawing insights and experiences from a wide range of stakeholders, which enhances the relevance and applicability of the guidance provided.
• Focus on Systemic Change
  Project Include emphasizes systemic changes rather than one-off initiatives, aiming for long-term impact in creating inclusive work environments.
• Resource Availability
  The platform offers a wealth of resources, including research, personal stories, and practical tools for companies looking to improve D&I practices.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Scope of Industries
  While comprehensive for tech, the strategies may not be directly applicable to non-tech industries without adaptation.
• Implementation Challenges
  Companies may find it challenging to implement the recommended changes due to varying organizational cultures and resources.
• Voluntary Participation
  Adoption of Project Include’s recommendations is voluntary, which may limit broader systemic changes across industries.
• Resource Intensive
  Effective implementation of the recommendations can require significant time and resource investment from participating companies.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

No analysis of Project Include yet.

Project Include wins the TechCrunch Include Award

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• FAANG is heavily Asian/Indian?

  Thanks to Project Include, most of the major companies issue annual diversity reports. Source: about 4 years ago

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago