Have you ever read any of the introductory material that the git project itself maintains for teaching how to use the tool? - https://git-scm.com/docs/gittutorial - https://git-scm.com/docs/giteveryday - https://git-scm.com/docs/gitworkflows - https://git-scm.com/docs/gitfaq - https://git-scm.com/cheat-sheet Or if you want to sit down and really learn the nuts and bolts - https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2. - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago

I was uncomfortable with git until I read (the first 3 chapters of) the pro git book ( free here : https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2 ). It provides a great mental model of how git works under the hood. The UI of git - for better or worse - directly reflects its internals. And when I understood them, everything clicked into place. - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago

This reminds me of a passage from the book "Pro Git". "Here’s an example to give you an idea of what it would take to get a SHA-1 collision. If all 6.5 billion humans on Earth were programming, and every second, each one was producing code that was the equivalent of the entire Linux kernel history (6.5 million Git objects) and pushing it into one enormous Git repository, it would... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

If you want to go deeper into how Git actually works, the Pro Git book is the best resource out there. It is free to read online at https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2 and covers everything from basics to advanced internals. I highly recommend it if you really want to master Git. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

The relevant XKCD comic https://xkcd.com/1597/ FWIW I too was once a "memorised a few commands and that was it" type of dev, then I read 3 chapters of the Git book https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2 (well really two, the first chapter was a "these are things you already know") and wow did my life with git change. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago