star-history VS Stack Overflow Trends

That’s a great project you pulled off. From the time I starred it (10-12h ago I think), and upon re-checking this post, you gained 500+ stars lol. Visualized in a chart with star-history: https://star-history.com/#nilsherzig/LLocalSearch. - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago

You can actively see a fresh "hype curve" in the transformer-debugger repo that was posted a couple days ago (https://github.com/openai/transformer-debugger). Regardless of the repo's stars or how valuable it really is, at the time I saw it posted to HN, it had 1.6k stars/16 hours. What channel are people listening to to star it so quickly. I'm not implying any nefariousness, mind you, I'm only wondering where all... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

I’ve been releasing open-source projects for years now, and I’ve always wanted to see how fast my Github repo is growing compared to other successful repositories on https://star-history.com/. The problem is that on Star History, I’m unable to zoom into the graph, so a new repo that has 1,000 stars cannot be compared with a big repo that has 50,000 because you can’t see how the bigger repo does in its beginning.... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

i'm a one man shop in montana, competing w/ Google, Vercel & Facebook for dev mindshare if I did what everyone else does you never would have heard of htmx https://star-history.com/#bigskysoftware/htmx&Date . - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Finished a close second behind react and ahead of svelte, vue, vue2, vue + vue2, angular, solidjs, quick: https://star-history.com/#bigskysoftware/htmx&bigskysoftware/_hyperscript&Date idk what a steep growth trajectory is to you, but this has felt pretty steep to me: https://star-history.com/#bigskysoftware/htmx&bigskysoftware/_hyperscript&Date. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago