No PrivacyTests.org videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, FingerprintJS should be more popular than PrivacyTests.org. It has been mentiond 59 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Https://privacytests.org Maintained by a Brave employee, though the site is fully open in all senses of the word, as far as I'm aware. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
Firefox is a less bad option, even with the recent stupid policy changes they've made. Or there are a bunch of [other options that care about privacy](https://privacytests.org/), Brave, Librewolf, Arc, Zen, Orion (Kagi's thing). I tried Orion for a couple days, but it started crashing randomly and felt unstable and slowed down after real-world use (3-4 windows, many many tabs). I really wish there was more... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
"Brave will continue to work with legitimate testing sites like https://privacytests.org and https://coveryourtracks.eff.org". - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Firefox doesn't have ECH support (atleast not turned on by default) https://privacytests.org/ (Scroll down to Misc tests). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Ive rarely have success conviencing others on a particular browser anymore - I just give em: https://privacytests.org/ personally I go with FF/forks since its not a direct spawn from chromium/google; that and the FF containers is my go-to. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Yeah, you get the exact same results in two separate incognito sessions in stock Chrome. They don't immediately add your fingerprint to their database. (And that site isn't using the state of the art in fingerprinting - check https://fingerprint.com/ for a slightly better indicator.). - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
Used SEON (super fast start, analytics limited) and FingerprintJS (more options, more setup). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
The more egregious and frankly disgusting one is https://fingerprint.com IMO this service should straight up be made illegal. I love the tagline they have of supposedly "stopping fraud" or "bots", when it's obvious it's just privacy invasive BS that straight up shouldn't exist, least of all as an actual company with customers. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Fingerprint - https://fingerprint.com/ | Bot Detection Researcher (TS, JS), Senior TPM (Mobile Device Intelligence) | Full Time | Remote Fingerprint empowers developers to stop online fraud at the source. We work on turning radical new ideas in the fraud detection space into reality. Our products are developer-focused and our clients range from solo developers to publicly traded companies. 100% Remote, Global... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Https://fingerprint.com/ seems to provide a very resilient way to identify repeat visitors. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Cover Your Tracks - Cover Your Tracks is a website that comes with an agile approach for the users to test the privacy of add-ons with best-in-class tools and techniques with complete online support.
SHIELD - SHIELD is the first line of defense against fraud, empowering businesses to build trust and drive growth with persistent device fingerprinting and intelligence.
BrowserLeaks.com - BrowserLeaks.com is a website that checks how much private information your web browser is leaking...
SEON - SEON Sense Platform is a modular and AI-powered fraud detection software that deliver clear results with an automated, machine-driven workflow.
LibreWolf - LibreWolf, the community-maintained fork of Librefox: a privacy and security-focused browser.
Kount - eCommerce fraud detection & prevention