Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Preact.js VS WebComponents.dev

Compare Preact.js VS WebComponents.dev and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Preact.js logo Preact.js

Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

WebComponents.dev logo WebComponents.dev

The modern IDE for web platform developers
  • Preact.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11
  • WebComponents.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-11

Preact.js features and specs

  • Size
    Preact is very small in size (about 3KB gzipped), which makes it easy to load and faster to execute, resulting in improved performance and quicker load times.
  • Compatibility
    Preact is largely compatible with React, allowing developers to switch to Preact with minimal code changes. This makes it easier to adopt for projects already using React.
  • Performance
    Due to its small size and efficient design, Preact offers excellent performance, especially on low-powered devices and in applications with heavy user interactions.
  • Ecosystem
    Preact can work with many tools and libraries that are designed for React, giving developers access to a rich ecosystem of resources.
  • Community
    Preact has an active and growing community that provides support, plugins, and third-party tools, making it easier for developers to find solutions and share knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Preact.js

  • Feature Set
    While Preact covers most of the core React features, it lacks some of the advanced functionality present in React, which may require additional workarounds or third-party libraries.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from a non-React background, learning Preact might involve a learning curve, particularly because of its similarities and subtle differences with React.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Although many tools designed for React can work with Preact, some might not be directly compatible, requiring additional configuration or patches.
  • Community Size
    While Preact has a supportive community, it is smaller compared to the massive React community, which can result in fewer available resources and third-party packages.
  • Maturity
    Preact, being newer and less widely adopted than React, might not have the same level of battle-tested reliability for all use cases, especially for large scale applications.

WebComponents.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WebComponents.dev provides a streamlined platform to create, share, and experiment with web components without needing extensive configuration or setup. This lowers the barrier to entry for both new and experienced developers.
  • Component Library
    The platform includes a rich library of pre-built components and templates, enabling developers to quickly find and integrate components into their projects.
  • Collaborative Environment
    WebComponents.dev supports collaboration by allowing developers to share their components with others easily. This fosters community engagement and learning opportunities.
  • Integration with Popular Frameworks
    It supports integration with popular frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, making it versatile and useful for developers working across different ecosystems.

Possible disadvantages of WebComponents.dev

  • Limited Customization
    While WebComponents.dev offers many features for component development and sharing, the platform’s environment might limit some advanced customization possibilities compared to traditional development setups.
  • Dependence on the Platform
    Projects heavily reliant on WebComponents.dev might face challenges if the platform experiences downtime or significant changes, as they are dependent on a third-party service for their development workflow.
  • Performance Overhead
    Developing and running components within a browser-based IDE might introduce performance overheads not present in local development environments.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    While designed to be user-friendly, there might be a learning curve for developers unfamiliar with web components or the specific paradigms of WebComponents.dev.

Preact.js videos

+ Add

JS frameworks are replaceable

WebComponents.dev videos

No WebComponents.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Preact.js and WebComponents.dev)

Preact.js

WebComponents.dev

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Developer Tools
68 68%
Developer Tools
32% 32
JavaScript Framework
93 93%
JavaScript Framework
7% 7
Development Tools
0 0%
Development Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Preact.js and WebComponents.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Preact.js and WebComponents.dev

Preact.js Reviews

Top JavaScript Frameworks in 2025
PreactJS is a JavaScript library that is said to be the fast 3Kb alternative to ReactJS using the same modern API. It implements the fastest virtual DOM compared to other frameworks in the market. Moreover, it is one of the smallest libraries in terms of size.
Source: solguruz.com
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
Preact is like React’s little sibling, smaller in size but with the same familiar moves. It’s cutting down the fluff and zipping through tasks with less overhead. When performance budgets are tight, Preact wiggles in perfectly.
Source: tms-outsource.com
20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Preact is built with the same core principle of React – A component-based approach with Virtual DOM while completely compatible with React. It can even use React packages without compromising on speed, performance, and leaner size. In instances where the full potential of React isn’t necessary, most developers even use React during development and switch to Preact for...
Source: www.lambdatest.com
Top 15 jQuery Alternatives To Know
ReactJS is a powerful JavaScript library to create user interfaces. Developers can design easy views at each stage in the application and there is regular update and rendering for the actual components whenever there is any data alteration. It is component-driven and creates encapsulated components that manage their own state.
Source: www.spec-india.com
Top 5 JavaScript Frameworks To Learn in 2021
But according to the graph above, we can notice a decrease in interest in Preact. This might result from having many similar frameworks with the same specs, like react-lite, Inferno, etc. However, knowing a framework like Preact will be useful for your development journey.
Source: enlear.academy

WebComponents.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of WebComponents.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Preact.js seems to be a lot more popular than WebComponents.dev. While we know about 93 links to Preact.js, we've tracked only 9 mentions of WebComponents.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Preact.js mentions (93)

View more

WebComponents.dev mentions (9)

  • Painless Web Components: Naming is (not too) Hard
    How the tag name gets into your code can vary based on the method you are using to write your components. If you load up a few of the templates over on WebComponents.dev you'll see that many examples just use a string value typed into the define function directly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • free-for.dev
    WebComponents.dev — In-browser IDE to code web components in isolation with 58 templates available, supporting stories and tests. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Why Atomico js webcomponents?
    We will show the benefits of Atomico through a comparison, we have used as a basis for this comparison the existing counter webcomponents in webcomponents.dev of Atomico, Lit, Preact and React as a base. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Javascript animation in LWC, tried Motion one
    Unfortunately, I couldn't get this to work in the online LWC editor https://webcomponents.dev So assuming this also won't work in the shadow DOM enviroment of SF? Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Cute Solar System with CSS
    WebComponentsDev have a lot of libraries and info (like codesandbox, but webcomponents land): Https://webcomponents.dev/. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Preact.js and WebComponents.dev, you can also consider the following products

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Arbiter IDE - The offline-friendly, in-browser IDE for pure JS prototypes

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps

Inferno - An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.

CodeOnline - A remote and secure workspace powered by VSCode

Loading...