Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PollMaker VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare PollMaker VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PollMaker logo PollMaker

We Make Publishing Real Simple

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
  • PollMaker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-29
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

PollMaker features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    PollMaker offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that simplifies the process of creating and managing polls, even for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Customization Options
    The platform provides a variety of customization features, allowing users to tailor the appearance and functionality of their polls to suit their specific needs.
  • Real-Time Results
    PollMaker provides real-time results, enabling users to track and analyze responses as they come in, thus facilitating timely decision-making and insights.
  • Variety of Question Types
    The platform supports multiple question types, such as multiple choice, dropdowns, and star ratings, allowing for versatile survey creation.
  • Integration Capabilities
    PollMaker can be integrated with various platforms and services, enhancing its utility by allowing seamless sharing and embedding of polls.

Possible disadvantages of PollMaker

  • Limited Free Features
    The free version of PollMaker has limited features, which may not suffice for users with advanced needs or larger audiences.
  • Ads in Free Version
    Polls created with the free version may include ads, which can be distracting to respondents and may diminish the professionalism of the survey.
  • Pricing Structure
    For extended functionalities and higher response limits, users need to subscribe to paid plans, which might be costly for budget-conscious individuals or small businesses.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    As with any online service, there may be concerns about data privacy and security, particularly if sensitive information is being collected.
  • Basic Reporting Tools
    The reporting and analytics tools available might be too basic for users looking for in-depth data analysis and insights.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

PollMaker videos

No PollMaker videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison โ€“ LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PollMaker and CrossBrowserTesting)
Feedback Polls
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Online Services
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PollMaker and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than PollMaker. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PollMaker mentions (2)

  • Best Doom Level Poll - Episode 1 Quarterfinal 1
    The polls are run on poll-maker.com. Today's poll lasts from 19.30 GMT 11/4/2021 - 19.30 GMT 11/5/2021. Source: over 4 years ago
  • [Poll] Which one of these 18 coins do you think will rise the most by the end of 2021?
    I created the poll on poll-maker.com since Reddit only allows you to enter 6 options. Source: about 5 years ago

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we donโ€™t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • How do yโ€™all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PollMaker and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products

PollUnit - Create and customize public or anonymous votings, surveys, free tables, idea collections or audio, video and photo contests.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

poll.ly - Your perfect partner to gather ideas and opinions in real time

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Fast Poll - Create instant, real-time polls for free

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.