PlayCanvas VS AppWrite
Compare PlayCanvas VS AppWrite and see what are their differences
Shared cloud environments for AI coding agents. Run Claude Code, Cursor CLI, Codex, and Gemini CLI from any device, API, or automation tool.
featured
PlayCanvas
Unity
Unreal Engine
Blender
Godot Engine
CryENGINE
Stencyl
Cocos2d
AppWrite
Supabase
Firebase
Clerk
PocketBase.io
Convex.dev
PropelAuth
Xano
PlayCanvas AppWritePlayCanvas is recommended for indie developers, small to medium-sized teams, and educational purposes. It is especially suited for those who are looking to create web-based 3D content quickly and efficiently without needing extensive proprietary tools. It's also beneficial for projects that require real-time collaborative development environments.
AppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.
No AppWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
As someone who recently started game development, finding the right engine has always been very difficult, It was till Chat-GPT (yes the Ai) recommended me playcanvas, it's Ui was challenging and its learning curve was steep, but at the end of the day it felt rewarding to understand and achieve something. So my final verdict, if you want to make 3D games, not go through the hassle of unity or work anywhere anytime, go for playcanvas.
I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.
Based on our record, AppWrite should be more popular than PlayCanvas. It has been mentiond 178 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
BabylonJS and the OP's own Aframe [1] seem to have similar licenses, similar number of Github stars and forks, although Aframe seems newer and more game / VR focused. How do Babylon, Aframe, Three.js, and PlayCanvas [2] compare from those that have used them? IIUC, PlayCanvas is the most mature, featureful, and performant, but it's commercial. Babylon is the featureful 3D engine, whereas Three.js is fairly raw.... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
For some reason that I cannot understand in my case the calculated shading normals are pixelated. Compared to playcanvas.com (probably a forward renderer), mine is like utter shit. Source: about 3 years ago
PlayCanvas has been using WordPress for 12 years now. Generally speaking, it's been fine. However, after much consideration, we have migrated away to Jekyll + GitHub Pages. I thought our experience might be of interest to other WordPress users (if only to confirm why you wouldn't consider switching): Https://blog.playcanvas.com/moving-from-wordpress-to-jekyll-a-case-study/ Interested to hear peoples' thoughts... Source: about 3 years ago
It's just a cool tech demo that pushes CSS to its limits, but it's completely useless if you want to create usable 3d models. If you want to model in the browser, you can check out vectary, playcanvas, or spline. Source: about 3 years ago
The model in the video has no spheres, which is why the performance is decent. In any case, I agree with you for the most part, I'm just lazy and didn't expect anyone to actually want to use this for serious modelling. You should check out playcanvas or vectary if you are serious about in-browser 3D modelling. Source: about 3 years ago
Initially, I was using the Supabase free tier, but I was hitting the limits, and my app was becoming stale. Then I switched to Appwrite. Both are totally different; one is SQL, while the latter one is NoSQL. Although use node-appwrite package to skip the manual schema add-ons. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Appwrite is an open-source platform that simplifies backend setup by providing authentication, databases, storage, functions, and hosting all in one place. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
I love Appwrite. My first hackathon was actually from Appwrite (using Appwrite) 2 years ago, and I've been using it ever since. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Appwrite | Remote | Platform Engineers, AI, Interns | https://www.appwrite.careers Appwrite (https://appwrite.io) is an open-source backend platform that helps developers build secure web and mobile apps faster. Weโre hiring engineers across multiple teams to improve infrastructure, expand developer tooling, and scale our platform. Open roles: โ Platform Engineer. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Unity - The multiplatform game creation tools for everyone.
Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative
Unreal Engine - Unreal Engine 4 is a suite of integrated tools for game developers to design and build games, simulations, and visualizations.
Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.
Blender - Blender is the open source, cross platform suite of tools for 3D creation.
Clerk - Clerk.io, the artificial intelligence for e-commerce that knows your customers interests.