Software Alternatives & Startups

pkgsrc VS pacaur

Compare pkgsrc VS pacaur and see what are their differences

pkgsrc

pkgsrc is a framework for building over 17,000 open source software packages.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
pacaur

An AUR helper that minimizes user interaction.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, pkgsrc seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 12 times since March 2021.

social mentions
12 vs 0
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
63 vs 10

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

pkgsrc
pacaur
Website pkgsrc.org github.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

pkgsrc 5 features
pacaur 4 features
  • Cross-Platform Support
    pkgsrc is designed to be a portable package management system and can be used on a variety of Unix-like operating systems, including NetBSD, Solaris, Linux, and macOS. This cross-platform capability makes it a versatile tool for developers working in diverse environments.
  • Consistency Across Systems
    Using pkgsrc allows for a consistent package management experience regardless of the underlying operating system, reducing the learning curve and maintenance overhead for administrators managing multiple systems.
  • Comprehensive Package Collection
    pkgsrc offers a wide range of software packages, providing a robust collection that can meet diverse user needs from scientific libraries to web applications.
  • Quarterly Releases
    With quarterly releases, pkgsrc provides a balanced approach between stability and keeping software up to date, offering users new features regularly while maintaining reliability.
  • Flexible Build Options
    pkgsrc supports a flexible build system, allowing users to customize package builds with specific options or dependencies, tailored to their specific needs or system requirements.

Possible disadvantages

  • Smaller Community
    Compared to other popular package management systems like apt (Debian/Ubuntu) or yum (RedHat/CentOS), pkgsrc has a relatively smaller community, which might affect the availability of support and community-driven improvements.
  • Potentially Older Software
    While pkgsrc maintains stable quarterly releases, it may occasionally lag behind other systems in terms of offering the very latest versions of certain software, which might not be ideal for users needing the newest features.
  • Manual Configuration
    Setting up pkgsrc might require manual interventions and configurations, which could pose a hurdle for users unfamiliar with its setup process or those who prefer more automated solutions.
  • Dependency Management
    Although pkgsrc is quite capable in dependency handling, some users may find its dependency resolution to be less automatic or seamless compared to other systems which offer more integrated solutions.
  • Performance Overhead
    Because it is designed to be cross-platform, there can be some performance overhead associated with using pkgsrc compared to native package managers that are optimized for specific operating systems.
  • AUR Support
    Pacaur provides seamless integration with the Arch User Repository (AUR), allowing users to easily access and install a wide variety of user-submitted packages.
  • Dependency Management
    Pacaur automatically handles dependencies for AUR packages, ensuring that all necessary components are installed without user intervention.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Pacaur offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies package management, making it easier to search, install, and manage packages.
  • Automation of Tasks
    Pacaur automates many routine tasks such as updates and installations, reducing the time and effort required from the user.

Possible disadvantages

  • Maintenance Status
    As of its last updates, Pacaur is no longer actively maintained, which may lead to compatibility issues with newer systems and limits future improvements or bug fixes.
  • Complexity for New Users
    Although it offers advanced features, Pacaur can be complex for new Arch users who are unfamiliar with terminal-based package management tools.
  • Potential for Breakage
    Being an AUR helper means Pacaur installs unsupported packages which might sometimes conflict with official packages, potentially causing system instability.
  • Dependency on AUR
    Pacaur relies heavily on the AUR, which can be unreliable at times due to user-submitted content, including potentially outdated or unmaintained packages.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

pkgsrc 2 videos + Add
pacaur 1 video + Add

pkgsrc on ChromeOS

More videos

  • - Using pkgsrc for multi-platform deployments in heterogeneous environments, G Clifford Williams

use the AUR? time to get a new helper (pacaur, yaourt, yay)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
pkgsrc
pacaur
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using pkgsrc and pacaur. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

pkgsrc 12 mentions
pacaur 0 mentions
  • What the heck is /pkg?
    As a NetBSD user, I would guess it is for use with pkgsrc. That would be great for mac people if my wild guess is correct. http://pkgsrc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 23 days ago
  • Debian isn't waiting for 2038 to blow up, switches to 64-bit time for everything
    > Most open source software packages are also compiled for BSD variants, they switched to 64 bit time_t a long time ago and reported back upstream any problems. * NetBSD in 2012:... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Our Audit of Homebrew
    > https://pkgsrc.smartos.org/install-on-macos/ Note that Pkgsrc is a NetBSD-derived project. * https://pkgsrc.org The Joyent folks leveraged it to allow their customers, who were perhaps not as familiar with Solaris/SmartOS, a... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

Tracking pacaur since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to pkgsrc and pacaur

When comparing pkgsrc and pacaur, you can also consider the following products.

  • Conda

    Binary package manager with support for environments.

    Compare Conda to pkgsrc or pacaur:

  • Yay

    Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.

    Compare Yay to pkgsrc or pacaur:

  • Homebrew

    The missing package manager for macOS

    Compare Homebrew to pkgsrc or pacaur:

  • paru

    An AUR helper written in Rust and based on the design of yay. It aims to be your standard pacman wrapping AUR helper with minimal interaction.

    Compare paru to pkgsrc or pacaur:

  • pikaur

    AUR helper with minimal dependencies. Review PKGBUILDs all in once, next build them all without user interaction.Inspired by pacaur, yaourt and yay.

    Compare pikaur to pkgsrc or pacaur:

  • Portage

    Portage is source-based package manager used by Gentoo and its descendants. It controls all process from fetching source through building it, installing into clean environment to "merging" with already installed software.

    Compare Portage to pkgsrc or pacaur: