PHP
Python
JavaScript
Java
Ruby
C#
C++
HTML5
Clearbit
Lusha
Apollo.io
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
We recommend LibHunt PHP for discovery and comparisons of trending PHP projects.
ClearbitBased on our record, PHP should be more popular than Clearbit. It has been mentiond 56 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The PHP website is indeed one of the worst parts of the whole ecosystem. Just look at the landingpage (https://php.net) and compare it with those of other languages. There's not a single piece of PHP code on the page. No "what is PHP", no "why should I use it", and no "that's why PHP is great". It's just a news page showing the latest releases, and a small section for downloading PHP. And speaking of the website:... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
My initial idea was to leverage the main applicationโs queue worker by deploying a queue worker remotely and setting up a secure connection between them using something like Wireguard. Vigilant is written in PHP using the Laravel framework, for queuing it uses Laravel Horizon. This is a queuing system built on top of Redis. All monitoring tasks in Vigilant are executed on this queue, it allows for multiple queues... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
I remember being 15 (18 years ago ๐ฅฒ) and learning PHP. Stack Overflow wasnโt as big yet, and finding answers often meant digging through forums filled with half-baked solutions, each dependent on specific hosting configurations. There was no universal standard, some hosts supported certain php.ini settings while others didnโt. The only reliable resource? The official PHP documentation: php.net. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
That's the first I've heard of it, and I like it! I can't tell you the number of trips to php.net to look at argument order for a function. Is it haystack/needle, or needle/haystack? Of course it could turn into the same thing w/ argument names (is it whole_name or full_name?), but I'm going to use it. Source: about 3 years ago
Prepare to spend a fair bit of time reading and going back to phptherightway.com and php.net. I've also found this Tutorial from Envato Tuts+ to be quite good. Source: about 3 years ago
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Java - A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.
