
C++
Smalltalk
F#
D (Programming Language)
Perl
Pike programming language
Crystal (programming language)
Pharo is a pure object-oriented programming language and a powerful environment, focused on...

fd
fzf
Starship (Shell Prompt)
lazygit
tmux
fish shell
Micro
A cat(1) clone with wings.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Bat should be more popular than Pharo. It has been mentioned 121 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | pharo.org | github.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Developers, system administrators, and technical users who work with code or configuration files and need an enhanced command-line tool that offers syntax highlighting and other advanced features. It is especially recommended for those using Git, as Bat provides seamless integration with Git repositories, displaying file changes and annotations effectively.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Black Ops 3 In Depth: Pharo Burst Fire SMG Review (Best SMG?)
$30 WOOD BAT vs $150 WOOD BAT - Louisville Slugger Wood Bat Reviews - Bat Bros in VEGAS
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Pharo and Bat. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


If someone wants to try it out, both Glamorous Toolkit and plain Pharo have tooling that allows integration of both local and remote LLM services. Some links to start off with: https://gtoolkit.com/ https://github.com/feenkcom/gt4llm... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Not to be confused with Pharo, the immersive programming experience: https://pharo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Are you using Pharo already? If not, give it a go: https://pharo.org/ For taking notes and stuff you'd otherwise do in Jupyter or Livebook, try GT: https://gtoolkit.com/ It's not an OS, but you can just abstract over OS actions within... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
But for reading code, scripts, configs, Markdown, YAML, JSON, or anything where your eyes are expected to survive the experience, bat is much nicer. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Bat does not look like a pager: https://github.com/sharkdp/bat?tab=readme-ov-file#automatic-paging. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Bat is the king of pagers. https://github.com/sharkdp/bat. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
When comparing Pharo and Bat, you can also consider the following products.

Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation
Compare C++ to Pharo or Bat:


Smalltalk is an object-oriented programming (OOP) language. It is objects all the way down.
Compare Smalltalk to Pharo or Bat:


F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.
Compare F# to Pharo or Bat:

Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.
Compare Starship (Shell Prompt) to Pharo or Bat: