Software Alternatives & Startups

PDFMonkey VS Apache CXF

Compare PDFMonkey VS Apache CXF and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PDFMonkey logo PDFMonkey

Automate your PDF generation.

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index
  • PDFMonkey Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

PDFMonkey is your automation tool perfect for generating a high volume of PDFs. HTML to PDF with our restless API or with various automation tool such as Zapier, Make or Bubble. Link it with thousands of tools to automate your workflow and simplify your PDF management.

  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29

PDFMonkey

$ Details
freemium €15 / Monthly (3000 documents, 7 days retention, Load images, fonts, CSS & JS)
Platforms
Make Bubble Automation Zapier
Release Date
2019 April
Startup details
Country
France
State
Paris
City
Paris
Employees
1 - 9

Apache CXF

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

PDFMonkey features and specs

  • Snippets
    Share code between different templates
  • Direct generation
    Generate a PDF when updated informations
  • XML embedding
    Insert XML inside the PDF and generate a PDF 3-A compatible factur-X
  • PDF generation
    PDF generation that you can connect with thousands of tools

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

PDFMonkey videos

PDFMonkey - explained

Apache CXF videos

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PDFMonkey and Apache CXF)
PDF Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Ruby Web Framework
0 0%
100% 100
Document Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing PDFMonkey and Apache CXF.

What makes your product unique?

PDFMonkey's answer

PDFMonkey is a simple PDF generation tool that can make your task easier with automated shipping labels, invoices or any other PDF hassle.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

PDFMonkey's answer

PDFMonkey is one of the oldest in the market but also one of the best tool giving advanced features and improved support on automation tools such as Zapier, Make and bubble.

User comments

Share your experience with using PDFMonkey and Apache CXF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PDFMonkey and Apache CXF

PDFMonkey Reviews

14 Best PDF APIs for Every Business Need
PDFMonkey helps you with automating the process of PDF generation. Using it, you can effortlessly manage your templates and insert dynamic data in them whenever necessary. Thus, it saves precious time for the developers that they would have spent writing codes for PDF.
Source: geekflare.com

Apache CXF Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache CXF yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache CXF should be more popular than PDFMonkey. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PDFMonkey mentions (1)

  • From PDFMonkey to Aim Monkey: Building internal tools that actually help
    One of the first features I worked on when starting my career was AIM's pdf generation tool. It was time to migrate off of PDF monkey's SaaS product to our own solution. We had to figure a way of maintaining the same templates we used with PDF moneky but reverse engineering the server side logic, this was quite the challenge on it's own, we managed to eventually do it but ended up with a extra friction and huge... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 3 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PDFMonkey and Apache CXF, you can also consider the following products

DocRaptor - As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

APITemplate.io - APITemplate.io allows you to auto-generate social images and PDF documents with a simple API or automation tools like Zapier & Airtable. No CSS/HTML required.

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

CraftMyPDF - PDF generation API for developers who ship fast.

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!