Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service VS Control-M

Compare Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service VS Control-M and see what are their differences

Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service logo Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service

A suite of next-generation integrated monitoring, management, and analytics cloud services built on a scalable big data platform that provides real-time analysis and deep technical and business insights.

Control-M logo Control-M

Controlโ€‘M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service features and specs

  • Comprehensive Integration
    Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service offers extensive integration capabilities with other Oracle products and services, providing a seamless experience for users familiar with the Oracle ecosystem.
  • Scalability
    The service is built to support large-scale operations and can handle the orchestration needs of growing enterprises effectively.
  • Automation
    Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service delivers powerful automation features that reduce manual intervention, enhancing efficiency and reducing human error.
  • Security
    The service includes robust security protocols ensuring data integrity and protection against threats.

Possible disadvantages of Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service

  • Complexity
    The comprehensive nature of the service can lead to a steep learning curve for new users, especially those unfamiliar with Oracle products.
  • Cost
    Oracle's solutions are often associated with higher costs, which may be prohibitive for smaller businesses or startups.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on Oracle's ecosystem can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to integrate non-Oracle products or switch to other providers.
  • Customization Limits
    While the service offers extensive features, there may be limitations in customization compared to more open-source or modular solutions.

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service videos

No Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service and Control-M)
Workflow Automation
22 22%
78% 78
IT Automation
19 19%
81% 81
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Product Deployment
31 31%
69% 69

User comments

Share your experience with using Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service and Control-M

Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service Reviews

We have no reviews of Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service yet.
Be the first one to post

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in โ€™23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Oracle Orchestration Cloud Service and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Resolve - Register gifts & expenses with simple GRC software Resolve is a simple Governance, Risk & Compliance reporting software purpose-built for declaring Gifts, Interests, Travels & Vehicle Expenses.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager - Cisco Workload Optimization Manager effectively matches application demand with infrastructure supply so that you can keep pace with changes in your business.

Lastpass - LastPass is an online password manager and form filler that makes web browsing easier and more secure.