Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager VS Control-M

Compare Cisco Workload Optimization Manager VS Control-M and see what are their differences

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager logo Cisco Workload Optimization Manager

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager effectively matches application demand with infrastructure supply so that you can keep pace with changes in your business.

Control-M logo Control-M

Controlโ€‘M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • Cisco Workload Optimization Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager features and specs

  • Resource Optimization
    The Cisco Workload Optimization Manager provides dynamic resource allocation based on real-time demand and supply, ensuring optimal utilization of IT resources.
  • Cost Efficiency
    By efficiently managing workloads and resources, it can help reduce infrastructure costs by avoiding over-provisioning and under-utilization.
  • Integration Capabilities
    This tool integrates with multiple environments and platforms, such as public, private, and hybrid clouds, providing a unified view and control.
  • Performance Improvements
    Enhances application performance by ensuring that workloads have the necessary resources to meet service level objectives.
  • Automation Features
    Offers automation capabilities to handle routine workload management tasks, helping to reduce manual intervention and errors.

Possible disadvantages of Cisco Workload Optimization Manager

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and may require a significant time investment and expertise.
  • Cost
    While it helps with cost efficiency, the licensing and operational costs can be high for small to medium-sized enterprises.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may face a steep learning curve when first using the platform, particularly if they lack experience with similar tools.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    Organizations might heavily rely on Ciscoโ€™s support for problem resolution, which could be a concern for time-sensitive issues.
  • Integration Challenges
    Despite broad integration capabilities, there might be challenges or limitations when integrating with specific third-party software or custom in-house applications.

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager videos

03 How to Setup Cisco Workload optimization manager A Z (part 01)

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cisco Workload Optimization Manager and Control-M)
Workflow Automation
25 25%
75% 75
IT Automation
21 21%
79% 79
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Product Deployment
37 37%
63% 63

User comments

Share your experience with using Cisco Workload Optimization Manager and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cisco Workload Optimization Manager and Control-M

Cisco Workload Optimization Manager Reviews

We have no reviews of Cisco Workload Optimization Manager yet.
Be the first one to post

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in โ€™23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cisco Workload Optimization Manager and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Resolve - Register gifts & expenses with simple GRC software Resolve is a simple Governance, Risk & Compliance reporting software purpose-built for declaring Gifts, Interests, Travels & Vehicle Expenses.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

vCloud Director - vCloud Director is an advanced cloud-based infrastructure platform designed specially to simplifies the operations of IT and provides the SLAs for application enhancement with ease.

Lastpass - LastPass is an online password manager and form filler that makes web browsing easier and more secure.