Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M

Controlโ€‘M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment. .

Control-M

Control-M Reviews and Details

This page is designed to help you find out whether Control-M is good and if it is the right choice for you.

Screenshots and images

  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

Features & Specs

  1. Comprehensive Job Scheduling

    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.

  2. Ease of Use

    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.

  3. Scalability

    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.

  4. Integrations

    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.

  5. Advanced Automation Features

    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.

  6. Robust Reporting

    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Badges

Promote Control-M. You can add any of these badges on your website.

SaaSHub badge
Show embed code

Videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

Control-M Self Service Overview

Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Summary of the public mentions of Control-M

BMC Control-M, a leader in the IT automation landscape, is widely recognized for its capacity to streamline and manage complex workflows. This product fits into several product categories: IT Automation, Workload Automation, Workflow Automation, Workflow Management, and Data Automation. Despite its robust capabilities, industry reviews and user feedback reveal a spectrum of opinions about its performance, integration features, and overall usability, especially compared to its competitors.

Strengths of Control-M:

Control-M has received positive feedback for its job scheduling feature, which records a high user satisfaction score of 9.4 on G2. Its reporting capabilities are also notable, providing users with insights into job execution and performance metrics. The interface supports robust reporting features that are crucial for organizations requiring detailed analysis of their IT processes. This makes it highly suitable for enterprises with complex automation needs, who benefit from its comprehensive workload management functionality.

Challenges and Limitations:

However, some users have identified limitations, particularly in API and integration capabilities with other applications. This is an essential consideration for businesses that rely heavily on seamless interoperability between multiple software solutions. In comparison, alternatives like ActiveBatch and Redwood not only surpass Control-M in functionality scores but also offer enhanced features, particularly for integration and API support.

Market Position and Competitor Analysis:

Control-M finds itself in a competitive space with alternatives such as ActiveBatch, Redwood, and several others offering compelling benefits. For instance, Redwood excels in performance and visibility, supporting over 25 scripting languages and interfaces, and features advanced architecture. It provides a high level of versatility with scripting support in languages such as Python, R, and PowerShell, alongside modern conveniences like syntax highlighting and parameter replacement.

Additionally, Redwoodโ€™s strategic migration programs offer a significant advantage for businesses contemplating a shift from Control-M, ensuring a smooth transition without disruption to operations. Similarly, products positioned as Control-M alternatives often bring distinct advantages in report generation, utilizing platforms like SQL and Hadoop, which allows for custom reporting tailored to specific business needs.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, Control-M remains a solid choice for many businesses, particularly those that prioritize robust job scheduling and comprehensive reporting capabilities. However, its weaker spots in API integration and functionality are notable areas of concern among users, driving some towards more versatile competitors like Redwood and ActiveBatch. Enterprises need to evaluate their specific needs, considering factors such as nature of business operations, integration requirements, and the need for advanced scripting support, before selecting an automation solution. As the landscape of IT automation continues to evolve, staying informed about these nuances will help organizations in making strategic technology decisions.

Do you know an article comparing Control-M to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.

Suggest an article

Control-M discussion

Log in or Post with

Is Control-M good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Control-M here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.