On Deck VS git-sizer

• Quick Funding
  On Deck offers quick and efficient funding for small businesses, often providing capital within 24 hours after approval.
• Flexible Loan Options
  Various loan products such as term loans, lines of credit, and SBA loans cater to different business needs.
• Simple Application Process
  The application process is predominantly online and simplified, making it convenient for busy business owners.
• No Minimum Credit Score
  On Deck does not require a minimum credit score, making it accessible to businesses that may not qualify for traditional bank loans.
• Strong Customer Support
  Offers robust customer support to guide borrowers through the application process and loan management.

Possible disadvantages

• High Interest Rates
  The interest rates can be significantly higher compared to traditional bank loans, which could lead to higher overall costs.
• Short Terms
  Loan terms are typically shorter, which means higher monthly payments and a shorter time to repay the loan.
• Additional Fees
  Potential for additional fees such as origination fees, which can add to the overall cost of the loan.
• Daily or Weekly Repayments
  Repayment schedules can be stringent, with daily or weekly payments that may impact cash flow for some businesses.
• Not Available in All States
  On Deck's services are not available in certain states, limiting its accessibility for some prospective borrowers.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

• Paid Networks

  What is the name of the group. ondeck.com has received a lot of positive reviews in VC and entrepreneur focused subs. There are supposedly some brand name VCs who benefited from it. Source: about 5 years ago

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago