Numbeo VS Commit Together by Github

• User-Generated Data
  Numbeo relies on contributions from users around the world, providing a diverse and broad range of data on cost of living in many locations.
• Wide Coverage
  The platform covers numerous countries and cities worldwide, making it useful for global comparisons of cost of living metrics.
• Regular Updates
  Numbeo is frequently updated with new data, reflecting recent changes in living costs which can be beneficial for up-to-date information.
• Comprehensive Categories
  Includes a wide array of cost categories such as housing, food, transportation, and utilities, helping users get a detailed view of living expenses.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The website's interface is designed to be intuitive and easy to navigate, making it accessible for users seeking information quickly.

Possible disadvantages

• Data Quality Variability
  Since the data is user-generated, the accuracy and reliability might vary based on the number and expertise of contributors in each area.
• Potential for Outdated Information
  In locations where fewer users contribute data, the information might not be updated as regularly, leading to potential outdated data.
• Lack of Verification
  Numbeo lacks a formal verification process for the data submitted, which can raise questions about the credibility of the information provided.
• Sample Size Limitations
  Smaller cities or less popular locations might have limited data due to fewer contributors, affecting the robustness of comparisons in these areas.
• Possible Bias
  The data may be biased towards the experiences and spending habits of those who contribute, which might not represent all demographics accurately.

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

• Employment with Portugal based company. What would be cost of living ?

  Also you can check numbeo.com/cost-of-living for an idea of the cost of living, https://www.idealista.pt/ is one of the most popular sites for housing that will be likelly your major cost. Source: over 5 years ago

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago