
Ninja Build
GNU Make
SCons
npm
Meson
Ender
JSHint
MakeMe
GitUp
GitKraken
SourceTree
SmartGit
Fork
GitHub Desktop
git-cola
tig
Ninja BuildNinja Build is recommended for developers working on large-scale projects with complex build processes, particularly in environments where build speed and efficiency are prioritized. It is especially beneficial for projects that are continuously integrated or require frequent incremental builds.
Based on our record, Ninja Build should be more popular than GitUp. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: about 3 years ago
The best gut GUI is GitUp: https://gitup.co/ Magit is not even close to be on the same level. Any insane operation you want at your fingertips. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
In about 12 years of using git (jj user now) I almost never rebased through the CLI, but I found shuffling branches around in a GUI (I liked GitUp https://gitup.co/) quite intuitive. The common view that a Git GUI is a crutch is quite wrong, even pernicious. To me it is the CLI that is a disruptive mediation, whereas in a GUI you can see and manipulate the DAG directly. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Iโm curious what the magit hunk selection UX consists in. I couldnโt find any videos showing something substantially different from the one built into jj โ the videos I found were meant as beginner intros. Iโve never used magit but I used GitUp (https://gitup.co/) for years before jj. I donโt find the jj one super natural, but I feel like thatโs mostly a matter of keyboard shortcuts โ I need to see if they can be... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
FWIW, the per line staging functionality in GitUp (https://gitup.co/) is quite easy and straightforward. Very lightweight program that you can open via cli (`gitup` when in a git directory). - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Gitup \Mac only]) and the command line at the same time. There are some esoteric commands I canโt remember so itโs nice having a GUI to do it and itโs nice having visual feedback incase of a screwup. Source: about 3 years ago
GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.
SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโthat is, a next-generation build tool.
SourceTree - Mac and Windows client for Mercurial and Git.
npm - npm is a package manager for Node.
SmartGit - SmartGit is a front-end for the distributed version control system Git and runs on Windows, Mac OS...