Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ninja Build VS Cloudify

Compare Ninja Build VS Cloudify and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Cloudify logo Cloudify

Accelerating Software Development & Deployment
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Cloudify Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-06

Cloudify provides infrastructure automation using โ€˜Environment as a Serviceโ€™ technology to deploy and continuously manage any cloud, private data center, or Kubernetes service from one central point while leveraging existing toolchains; Terraform, Ansible, and more. Use Cloudify to import existing automation templates and scripts and automatically convert them into certified environments. Manage them using the Cloudify console or export these environments to ServiceNow and enable users to deploy, continuously manage and maintain them as part of approval workflows.

Key Values: - Speed up deployments of your Test/Dev/Production environments. - Manage customers' heterogeneous cloud environments. - Enable Continuous Updates (Day-2) for your Production environments. - A clean API to work on top of all your tools that can easily be used within ServiceNow. - Manage Kubernetes clusters at scale.

Cloudify

$ Details
freemium
Platforms
SaaS Browser Premium Download
Release Date
2016 January

Ninja Build features and specs

  • Speed
    Ninja is designed for high performance, making it one of the fastest build systems available. It minimizes the time spent on tasks such as parsing, dependency resolution, and build command execution.
  • Simplicity
    Ninjaโ€™s configuration syntax is straightforward and concise, reducing the complexity involved in setting up builds and allowing for a clear overview of build rules.
  • Parallelism
    Ninja excels at handling parallel builds, leveraging multiple cores effectively to decrease overall build times.
  • Incremental Builds
    Ninja efficiently handles incremental builds by only recompiling what is necessary, which significantly speeds up iterative development processes.
  • Integration
    Ninja is often used as the backend for more complex build systems (e.g., CMake), making it a versatile tool within a larger toolchain.

Possible disadvantages of Ninja Build

  • Limited Features
    Ninja is deliberately minimalist, lacking many of the features found in other build systems, such as built-in support for complex dependency management and custom build steps.
  • Learning Curve
    While Ninja itself has a simple syntax, the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with how build systems work or for those coming from more feature-rich environments.
  • Dependency on Generators
    Ninja often requires an external generator (like CMake) to create its build files, which can add to the setup complexity and introduce dependencies on other tools.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    Unlike some build systems that offer extensive scripting support (e.g., Python in SCons), Ninja's functionality is largely limited to what its syntax and predefined rules allow.
  • Less Flexibility
    Due to its minimalist nature, Ninja may not be as flexible as other build systems, potentially limiting its use in more complex or unusual build scenarios.

Cloudify features and specs

  • Application Configuration Management
    Manage application configuration in a scalable and reliable way
  • Infrastructure Orchestration
    Integrate with your existing and future infrastructure
  • Environment Management
    Enable developers to create new environments whenever needed
  • Deployment Management
    Implement a Continuous Delivery or Continuous Deployment (CD) approach
  • Role-Based Access Control
    Manage who can do what in a scalable way
  • Self-service Catalog (via ITSM)
    Enable users to deploy, continuously manage and maintain environments as part of the approval workflow

Analysis of Ninja Build

Overall verdict

  • Ninja Build is considered a strong choice for users seeking a fast, reliable, and efficient build system. Its simplicity and focus on performance make it appealing to developers working on projects where build speed is critical.

Why this product is good

  • Ninja Build is a high-performance build system designed to handle complex build processes efficiently. It is known for its minimalistic yet powerful design, which allows for faster build times compared to traditional build systems like Make. Its approach to dependency tracking and parallelism is optimized for modern build environments, making it suitable for large codebases and incremental builds.

Recommended for

    Ninja Build is recommended for developers working on large-scale projects with complex build processes, particularly in environments where build speed and efficiency are prioritized. It is especially beneficial for projects that are continuously integrated or require frequent incremental builds.

Analysis of Cloudify

Overall verdict

  • Cloudify is a robust and versatile orchestration platform suitable for organizations needing to manage complex cloud deployments. It is particularly favored by enterprises looking for an open-source and flexible solution for multi-cloud and edge computing needs.

Why this product is good

  • Cloudify is a popular open-source platform known for orchestrating and managing cloud applications and services. It is valued for its ability to manage complex, distributed systems and simplifies deploying applications to the cloud. It supports multiple cloud environments and technologies, providing users with flexibility and scalability. Cloudify's use of TOSCA (Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications) enables users to model services more effectively, promoting service reuse and simplifying the management of infrastructure configurations.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with complex, multi-cloud environments.
  • Enterprises needing orchestration for both cloud-native and legacy applications.
  • Teams using DevOps practices and requiring continuous deployment and integration capabilities.
  • Projects that benefit from TOSCA-based modeling and service orchestration.

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Cloudify videos

Cloudify | Initial Deployment

More videos:

  • Demo - Cloudify | Day 02 application updates
  • Demo - Cloudify | Day 2 Infrastructure Updates
  • Demo - Cloudify | Initial Deployment with ServiceNow approvals
  • Demo - Complex Terraform Deployment

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Cloudify)
Front End Package Manager
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Cloudify. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be a lot more popular than Cloudify. While we know about 23 links to Ninja Build, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Cloudify. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (23)

  • CMake Made Simple: A Reusable Template for Your First C++ Project
    On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Using Make โ€“ writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Cloudify mentions (2)

  • Best IaC platforms
    Cloudify looks interesting if you can stand the price, depends how badly you need the features it offers. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Hey Cloud Peoples!
    Cloudify is a platform that automates and manages entire lifecycles of an application or network service. Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Cloudify, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

OpenShift - OpenShift gives you all the tools you need to develop, host and scale your apps in the public or private cloud. Get started today.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโ€”that is, a next-generation build tool.

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.