Nim (programming language) Reviews

packagecloud Reviews

Nim (programming language) mentions (165)

• Zig's Incremental Compilation Internals

  > GC languages are slower This is not necessarily true. It depends on a language, e.g. Go is slow, Nim[0] is extremely fast with conventional GC and slightly faster with ARC/ORC[1]. GC programs can be faster than manually managed ones in some cases. It's just manual memory management gives you more control of where and when free is called. And a good type system is a privelege that gives Nim more control with... - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago

• The road to epsilon-zero: Nim always ends, even with infinite ordinals

  First glance I thought someone was referring to https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 days ago

• Zig: Build System Reworked

  That's actually a great argument for Nim[0]. Easy interop with C, native-speed performance, and a syntax very close to Python in both readability and how quickly you can get something working. Batteries included, automatic memory management without a conventional GC and metaprogramming - is a really cool combination. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• Go-legacy-winxp: Compile Golang 1.24 code for Windows XP

  Coincidentally, just a few days ago, I tried to run Nim[0] on Windows XP as an experiment. And to my surprise, the latest 32-bit release of Nim simply works out the box. But Nim compiles to C, so I also needed C compiler and all modern versions of mingw failed to launch. After some time I managed to find very old Mingw (gcc 4.7.1) that have finally worked [0]. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/ [1] -... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Go Away Python

  You can replace Python with Nim. It checks literally all your marks (expressive, fast, compiled, strong-typing). It's as concise as Python, and IMO, Nim syntax is even more flexible. https://nim-lang.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

packagecloud mentions (5)

• Reports on successful blocks

  Looks like the repository on packagecloud.io don't have the latest version yet, it only lists 0.0.23? I got 0.0.24 from somewhere though. Source: over 3 years ago

• I tried to switch to the testing branch of Debian and below is my /etc/apt/sources.list:

  Forcing the config can be don manually by modifying the config files that points to different repos in /etc/apt/sources.list.d, or for packages on packagecloud.io, you can use the method that I describe. The latter works because packagecloud.io has a robust strip to create config files based on the detected operating systems or you can force a certain operating system/dist as shown above. Source: almost 4 years ago

• I tried to switch to the testing branch of Debian and below is my /etc/apt/sources.list:

  The error you are seeing is because you probably ran one of the steps that creates a configuration in your system that points to packagecloud.io, so that your system can retrieve packages from https://packagecloud.io/cs50/repo. However since there are no Debian bookworm packages there, you are seeing the error. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)

  Packagecloud.io — Hosted Package Repositories for YUM, APT, RubyGem and PyPI. Limited free plans, open source plans available via request. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago

• Need help installing Pi hole

  You have something installed via packagecloud.io which is no longer avalaible. Delete the line from your sources. Source: about 5 years ago