Nim (programming language) VS Hoverify

Tools to make your web dev life a bit easy.

⭐ Inspector 1) Inspect CSS and HTML just by hovering over the element. 2) Live edit CSS and HTML. 3) Export code to Codepen. 4) Inspect media queries and animations. 5) Edit the content of any HTML element. 6) Traverse DOM elements with arrow keys. 7) Know fonts per tag. 8) Finds font on Google Fonts. 9) Extract all the colors used on the page. 10) Toggle visibility of any element or remove an element from the page and persist changes.
11) Easily search elements by tag, class, or id.

⭐ Color Eyedropper 1) Pick colors from anywhere on the page, even images and IFrames. 2) Get hex and RGB values. 3) Save colors.

⭐ Assets 1) Extract images, SVGs, and videos from the page. 2) Download all the assets at once in ZIP.

⭐ Responsive 1) Any click, scroll, or navigation you perform in one device will be replicated to all devices in real-time. 2) Add new custom device profiles as you like and arrange devices to fit your style. 3) Hot-Reloading Support.

⭐ Debug 1) Clear cache, cookies, and local storage of specific origin or whole browser. 2) Get meta tags from the page and copy them with one click. 3) Check the whole page for spelling mistakes (Only supports English).

⭐ Screenshots 1) Take a screenshot of the whole page or just a visible area. 2) Screenshot the visible area of every tab with just one click. 3) Save the screenshot in PDF, JPG, or PNG.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Nim (programming language) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 166 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Nim (programming language) mentions (166)

F*: A general-purpose proof-oriented programming language
There's nim [1] which is aiming for the same thing - syntax similar to python and performance similar to C++, zig etc. 1 - https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
Zig's Incremental Compilation Internals
> GC languages are slower This is not necessarily true. It depends on a language, e.g. Go is slow, Nim[0] is extremely fast with conventional GC and slightly faster with ARC/ORC[1]. GC programs can be faster than manually managed ones in some cases. It's just manual memory management gives you more control of where and when free is called. And a good type system is a privelege that gives Nim more control with... - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
The road to epsilon-zero: Nim always ends, even with infinite ordinals
First glance I thought someone was referring to https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
Zig: Build System Reworked
That's actually a great argument for Nim[0]. Easy interop with C, native-speed performance, and a syntax very close to Python in both readability and how quickly you can get something working. Batteries included, automatic memory management without a conventional GC and metaprogramming - is a really cool combination. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Go-legacy-winxp: Compile Golang 1.24 code for Windows XP
Coincidentally, just a few days ago, I tried to run Nim[0] on Windows XP as an experiment. And to my surprise, the latest 32-bit release of Nim simply works out the box. But Nim compiles to C, so I also needed C compiler and all modern versions of mingw failed to launch. After some time I managed to find very old Mingw (gcc 4.7.1) that have finally worked [0]. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/ [1] -... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Hoverify mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hoverify yet. Tracking of Hoverify recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Compare Nim (programming language) VS Hoverify and see what are their differences