New World ERP VS Commit Together by Github

• Integration
  New World ERP offers seamless integration capabilities with various modules, ensuring a unified system that reduces data redundancy and improves efficiency.
• Scalability
  Designed to cater to a range of governmental organizations, New World ERP can scale according to the size and specific needs of the entity, supporting growth and adaptability.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The system provides a user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and manage their tasks, reducing the learning curve.
• Comprehensive Support
  Tyler Technologies provides extensive customer support, including training and technical assistance to ensure smooth implementation and operation.
• Targeted for Public Sector
  New World ERP is designed specifically for government entities, offering tailored solutions that address the unique challenges faced by the public sector.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  The initial setup and licensing costs can be high, which might be a barrier for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
• Complexity
  For some users, particularly those in smaller entities, the system's comprehensive features might seem overwhelming and unnecessarily complex.
• Customization Limits
  While the software is highly functional, there are limits to customization, which may not align with all specific organizational processes or workflows.
• Implementation Time
  Implementing New World ERP can be time-consuming, requiring careful planning and resources, which may disrupt daily operations during the transition period.
• Dependency on Vendor
  There can be a dependency on Tyler Technologies for updates and support, which may affect an organization's autonomy in managing their ERP solution.

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Tracking New World ERP since Mar 2021.

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago