Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

mParticle VS Apache CXF

Compare mParticle VS Apache CXF and see what are their differences

RepDB
Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

mParticle logo mParticle

mParticle is the customer data platform for brands leading the CX revolution. Unify data and simplify partner integrations with enterprise-class security and reliability.

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index
  • mParticle Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-24

mParticle believes that better customer experiences begin with better data. Its Customer Data Platform helps engineers, product managers, and marketers at companies like Spotify, Paypal, NBCUniversal, Starbucks, and Airbnb improve data quality and simplify integrations across the entire marketing stack. Founded in 2013, mParticle is headquartered in New York City with offices in San Francisco, Seattle, and London and manages more than 500 billion API calls monthly.

  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29

mParticle

Website
mparticle.com
Pricing URL
Official mParticle Pricing
$ Details
Platforms
Android iOS Web Roku
Release Date
2013 March
Startup details
Country
United States
State
New York
City
New York
Founder(s)
Andrew Katz
Employees
100 - 249
Edit details

Apache CXF

Website
cxf.apache.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

mParticle features and specs

  • Integrations
    Connect to 300+ of the leading marketing, analytics, warehousing, and activation tools
  • Demo Version
    demo.mparticle.com

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

mParticle videos

+ Add

mParticle Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - mParticle - 3DS Max 2014 Tutorial. Level: advanced (creating flying paper)

Apache CXF videos

+ Add

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mParticle and Apache CXF)

mParticle

Apache CXF

Customer Data Platform
100 100%
Customer Data Platform
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Web Analytics
100 100%
Web Analytics
0% 0
Ruby Web Framework
0 0%
Ruby Web Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using mParticle and Apache CXF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare mParticle and Apache CXF

mParticle Reviews

2025 Guide | Best Hightouch alternatives
mParticle is a traditional CDP, initially specialised in mobile event collection. It now offers all the key features of a CDP: data collection, storage, audience management, customisation, and even real-time use cases and predictive attributes thanks to its “Cortex” product.
Source: www.dinmo.com

Apache CXF Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache CXF yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Apache CXF might be a bit more popular than mParticle. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to mParticle. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mParticle mentions (2)

  • Huge memory leak on all browsers?
    Checking the logs, I found calls to mparticle.com. If those are not successful, the browser tab freezes completely. Safari eventually detects this and reloads it - just to freeze again. Source: about 4 years ago
  • What exactly is mparticle?
    For example, if you open and order something in a popular US-based food delivery app, you'd find DNS queries made to various mparticle.com subdomains while using the app because they use mParticle to:. Source: about 4 years ago

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: about 3 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mParticle and Apache CXF, you can also consider the following products

Segment - We make customer data simple.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Hightouch - What if you could power real-time product experiences with the analytical horsepower of a data warehouse?

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

Tealium - Enterprise tag management and digital data distribution (D3P).

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

Loading...