Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

mkws(1) VS fio

Compare mkws(1) VS fio and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

mkws(1) logo mkws(1)

Efficient Static Site Generator

fio logo fio

Generate I/O for benchmarking, stress testing, verification or workload reproduction purposes.
  • mkws(1) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-22
  • fio Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

mkws(1) features and specs

  • Simplicity
    mkws provides a straightforward and minimalist approach to setting up a static website, making it accessible to users with basic web development knowledge.
  • Lightweight
    Being a lightweight tool, mkws allows users to generate static websites without requiring significant system resources, making it ideal for quick projects or low-complexity sites.
  • Efficiency
    The tool is designed to reduce overhead by focusing on essential features for static site generation, resulting in a fast and efficient build process.
  • Portability
    As a shell script, mkws can be easily deployed across different Unix-like environments without the need for complex installation processes.

Possible disadvantages of mkws(1)

  • Limited Functionality
    mkws offers fewer features compared to more advanced static site generators, which might not meet the needs of users looking for a comprehensive set of tools.
  • Customization Constraints
    Due to its minimalist design, users may face limitations when attempting to customize their websites beyond basic configurations.
  • Lack of Ecosystem
    Unlike more established platforms, mkws does not have a large ecosystem of plugins or extensions, which could limit its expandability and support.
  • No GUI
    As a command-line tool, mkws might not be as user-friendly for individuals who prefer graphical interfaces over text-based interactions.

fio features and specs

  • Highly Flexible
    Fio is highly configurable, allowing users to simulate various types of workloads with detailed parameters. This flexibility makes it suitable for a wide range of performance testing scenarios, including block devices, files, and networked filesystems.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Fio is designed to work on multiple operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and macOS. This cross-platform support enhances its usability in diverse environments and facilitates testing across different systems.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Fio supports a multitude of I/O engines, including sync, mmap, libaio, posixaio, and others. Additionally, it allows for dynamic generation of patterns, scripting via functions, and varied reporting formats, which are ideal for comprehensive performance analysis.
  • Active Development and Support
    Being an open-source tool with a large community, fio receives regular updates and improvements from contributors, ensuring that it remains robust and relevant for modern testing needs.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Fio provides detailed and customizable output formats, such as JSON and normal text, which help users analyze performance metrics in depth and facilitate easy integration into performance testing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of fio

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive configuration options, while powerful, can be overwhelming for new users. It may take time and effort to learn how to effectively use fio and interpret its results without prior experience in performance testing.
  • Limited GUI Support
    Fio primarily operates from the command line, lacking a native graphical user interface (GUI). This can limit its accessibility for users who prefer visual tools and may require additional tooling or scripts for enhanced usability.
  • Resource-Intensive
    Running fio with complex workloads or on large-scale systems can be resource-intensive, potentially affecting other processes on the test system. Users need to ensure that appropriate resources are available to avoid skewed test results.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    For users seeking to employ advanced features like custom scripting or network testing, understanding the full scope of fio's capabilities and configuration syntax can be challenging without comprehensive documentation or community support.

mkws(1) videos

No mkws(1) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

fio videos

+ Add

MAZAYA CHAMBRA FIO | Review [+18]

More videos:

  • Review - Como escolher minhas tesouras (Fio, Tamanho e material) - REVIEW #15
  • Review - Os MELHORES fones sem fio de 2020? (Review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mkws(1) and fio)

mkws(1)

fio

Blogging
100 100%
Blogging
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100
HTML
100 100%
HTML
0% 0
Utilities
0 0%
Utilities
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using mkws(1) and fio. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

mkws(1) might be a bit more popular than fio. We know about 20 links to it since March 2021 and only 14 links to fio. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mkws(1) mentions (20)

View more

fio mentions (14)

  • Dire SMB speed with on PC to NAS
    Assuming two systems use flash storage, network bandwidth is identical and it is configured the same way, there should be an issue within the PC, either system or storage drive. Check the system logs for errors and warning events related to data transfer from/to NAS. Try to benchmark the PCs' disks using fio to confirm they have similar performance. https://github.com/axboe/fio. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
    Not specifically addressing your question, but when you get to the point of wanting to start doing some experiments you may find that 'fio' [1] is very handy. [1] https://github.com/axboe/fio. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • KVM virtual machines on ZFS benchmarks
    The dd is not a good benchmarking tool, you should use something like fio and probably tune it to use the ioengine most similar to your use case (eg. a database server will probably use some async IO interface). In your first example (with bs=1G) probably something (the guest OS, the qemu/kvm or the host OS) have split into smaller chunks anyway. Source: over 2 years ago
  • SSD Sequential Write Slowdowns
    All linux tests are run with fio 3.32 (github) with future commit 03900b0bf8af625bb43b10f0627b3c5947c3ff79 manually applied. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Just write the f*****g parser.
    Agree, I used flex/yacc to add an arithmetic expression evaluator to fio a few years back to allow simple math with some units in fio's job files, and for stuff like that, they're fine, but I wouldn't want to use them for a real language, the error handling is kind of a nightmare. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mkws(1) and fio, you can also consider the following products

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

CrystalMark - CrystalMark is a full included benchmark application that can be utilized for surveying the execution and capacities of a PC.

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test - Blackmagic Disk Speed Test is a tool that allows users to quickly measure disk performance while working on it.

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

CrystalDiskInfo - CrystalDiskInfo. A HDD/SSD utility software which supports a part of USB connection and Intel RAID. >> Download. Intel RAID (IRST). IRST 11.

Loading...