Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

mkws(1) VS CMark

Compare mkws(1) VS CMark and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

mkws(1) logo mkws(1)

Efficient Static Site Generator

CMark logo CMark

CMark is CommonMark implementation based on the C reference, which is a rationalized version of the Markdown syntax coming with the spec.
  • mkws(1) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-22
  • CMark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-01

mkws(1) features and specs

  • Simplicity
    mkws provides a straightforward and minimalist approach to setting up a static website, making it accessible to users with basic web development knowledge.
  • Lightweight
    Being a lightweight tool, mkws allows users to generate static websites without requiring significant system resources, making it ideal for quick projects or low-complexity sites.
  • Efficiency
    The tool is designed to reduce overhead by focusing on essential features for static site generation, resulting in a fast and efficient build process.
  • Portability
    As a shell script, mkws can be easily deployed across different Unix-like environments without the need for complex installation processes.

Possible disadvantages of mkws(1)

  • Limited Functionality
    mkws offers fewer features compared to more advanced static site generators, which might not meet the needs of users looking for a comprehensive set of tools.
  • Customization Constraints
    Due to its minimalist design, users may face limitations when attempting to customize their websites beyond basic configurations.
  • Lack of Ecosystem
    Unlike more established platforms, mkws does not have a large ecosystem of plugins or extensions, which could limit its expandability and support.
  • No GUI
    As a command-line tool, mkws might not be as user-friendly for individuals who prefer graphical interfaces over text-based interactions.

CMark features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mkws(1) and CMark)
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
HTML
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using mkws(1) and CMark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mkws(1) should be more popular than CMark. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mkws(1) mentions (20)

View more

CMark mentions (6)

  • Why Is This Site Built with C
    Using a portable minimal markdown dependency (such as cmark [1]) I think markdown can be quite a low barrier here. I personally do similar to what you have described on my blog, with an additional cmark conversion and find it quite simple [2]. [1] https://github.com/commonmark/cmark. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the simplest static website generator?
    I use GNU make. Write content in markdown, feed it to https://github.com/commonmark/cmark to create html. I intended to splice files together using xslt but echo and cat written in the makefile sufficed. I'm not totally sure I'd recommend that but I do like the markdown => html flow. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Building a Personal Internet from Markdown Files
    I seem to be in the middle of trying to build something similar to this. I want it to run on an android phone but otherwise the same sort of idea, offline-first information I want access to. There's some weirdness around android browsers refusing to load html from the phone itself on security grounds. The OP uses a "progressive web app" which seems to be the proper way to do this at some point in the past, but... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Using Rust with Elixir for code reuse and performance
    Yeah no doubt it, although in this case the C implementation has been a long running project that's under the official commonmark GitHub repo at https://github.com/commonmark/cmark. But I think the most important thing here is an Elixir NIF already exists to use it. The blog post as is leaves readers having to implement ~100 lines of Elixir code to use the Rust version because the authors of blog post didn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
  • How do I link and use a c library?
    I'm confused about how to use a c library (specifically, cmark) from zig. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mkws(1) and CMark, you can also consider the following products

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

CrystalMark - CrystalMark is a full included benchmark application that can be utilized for surveying the execution and capacities of a PC.

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Bazel - Bazel is a tool that automates software builds and tests.

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

fio - Generate I/O for benchmarking, stress testing, verification or workload reproduction purposes.