Microsoft Power Automate Reviews

Cppcheck Reviews

Microsoft Power Automate mentions (31)

• Is there any open source no code workflow tool?

  Hi, I am trying to build a no code tool workflow tool with blocks and connections between the blocks. Similar to power automate: https://powerautomate.microsoft.com/en-us/. Source: about 3 years ago

• Spreadsheet: export link in CSV

  Windows has an option called Power Automate https://powerautomate.microsoft.com/en-us/ that allows for, well automating such tasks as manually copying / pasting data https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-automate/getting-started. Source: about 3 years ago

• My coworkers and I have decided to start filling out the forms

  Try to use automation to fill it out ( https://powerautomate.microsoft.com/en-us/ for example). Source: about 3 years ago

• Automating my monkey job

  Https://powerautomate.microsoft.com/en-us/ might be something worth checking out if you have access. Source: about 3 years ago

• Should I quit learning Python?

  What is it that you actually want to achieve? Learning Python should have an overarching goal. Like being a programmer. If you would rather not be a programmer, and you don't like programming, but you would like to automate certain things on your PC, you might as well download and install https://powerautomate.microsoft.com/en-us/ . If you intend to understand, or work with, Big Data or AI, then Python totally is... Source: about 3 years ago

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago