
fzf
VS Code
fd
Neovim
Bat
Notepad++
Vim Adventures
Modern terminal-based text editor

Clojure
Elixir
C++
D (Programming Language)
Go Programming Language
Perl
Pike programming language
F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Micro should be more popular than F#. It has been mentioned 89 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | micro-editor.github.io | fsharp.org |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Micro yet.
We recommend LibHunt F# for discovery and comparisons of trending F# projects.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Micro is recommended for developers, system administrators, and anyone who frequently works within a terminal environment and needs a straightforward yet powerful text editor. It's particularly suitable for those who are looking for a simpler alternative to more complex editors like Vim or Emacs.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Microeconomics- Everything You Need to Know
More videos
F# Software Foundation Year in Review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Micro and F#. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Two more lines worth stealing. Micro as the editor, because I want a terminal editor that behaves like every other text field when I am editing a commit message at 11pm:. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
Micro editor is a great choice as well imo but I don't think that micro has the thriving plugin ecosystem as compared to neovim but it is possible to make plugins for micro editor as well https://github.com/micro-editor/plugin-channel... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
If you are talking about agents I feel like opencode has gotten pretty good UI/UX If you are talking about a CLI editor, then micro has hit the nail on quality UX https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
We'll use F# to implement this algorithm because functional programming is a good choice for "black box" problems like this that have no side-effects, and .NET is an easy, fast platform to work with. (F# is actually a great all-purpose... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
It's an open-source project with its own F# Software Foundation. If Microsoft drops it, I think it would continue. https://fsharp.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Before Rich made Clojure for the JVM, he wrote dotLisp[1] for the CLR. Not long after Clojure was JVM hosted, it was also CLR hosted[2]. One of my first experiences with ML was F#[3], a ML variant that targets the CLR. These all... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
When comparing Micro and F#, you can also consider the following products.


Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.
Compare Clojure to Micro or F#:

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
Compare VS Code to Micro or F#:

Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications
Compare Elixir to Micro or F#:


Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation
Compare C++ to Micro or F#: