We recommend LibHunt F# for discovery and comparisons of trending F# projects.
Functional Programming Paradigm
F# primarily supports functional programming, which promotes immutability and first-class functions, leading to more predictable and maintainable code.
Interoperability
F# provides seamless interoperability with .NET libraries and languages like C#, allowing developers to leverage a vast ecosystem of tools and libraries.
Conciseness
F# code tends to be concise and expressive, reducing boilerplate code and enhancing readability.
Type Inference
Powerful type inference capabilities reduce the need for explicit type annotations, making the code easier to write and refactor.
Asynchronous Programming
F# provides robust support for asynchronous programming, enabling the creation of responsive applications and efficient I/O handling.
Community and Resources
An active community and wealth of online resources provide support and facilitate learning through forums, tutorials, and documentation.
Multi-Paradigm
Despite its functional core, F# also supports imperative and object-oriented programming, offering flexibility to developers.
F# is particularly well-regarded in areas such as financial computing, data analysis, scientific computing, and machine learning. Its ability to combine functional programming paradigms with .NET's powerful libraries and tools provides a versatile environment for both small and large projects. However, it might not be the best fit for developers who are not familiar with functional programming or are working in domains where F# lacks extensive libraries compared to other languages like Python or JavaScript.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if F# is good.
Check the traffic stats of F# on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of F# on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of F#'s backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of F# on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about F# on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
We'll use F# to implement this algorithm because functional programming is a good choice for "black box" problems like this that have no side-effects, and .NET is an easy, fast platform to work with. (F# is actually a great all-purpose language for just about anything, but I digress.). - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
It's an open-source project with its own F# Software Foundation. If Microsoft drops it, I think it would continue. https://fsharp.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Before Rich made Clojure for the JVM, he wrote dotLisp[1] for the CLR. Not long after Clojure was JVM hosted, it was also CLR hosted[2]. One of my first experiences with ML was F#[3], a ML variant that targets the CLR. These all predate the MIT licensed .net, but prior to that there was mono, which was also MIT licensed. 1: https://dotlisp.sourceforge.net/dotlisp.htm 2: https://github.com/clojure/clojure-clr. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Oh yeah. A key hindrance of F# is that MS treats it like a side project even though it's probably their secret weapon, and a lot of the adopters are dotnet coders who already know the basics so the on-boarding is less than ideal. https://fsharp.org/ is the best place to actually start. https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/ is the standard recommendation from there but there's finally some good youtube and other... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Naturally Iโd recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#โs Fable + Elmish, but โReactโ is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as โless riskyโ for jobs/hiring, so here we are. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Are you really a bot? Yes, I'm a small F# program that glues together the public API's provided by Reddit and OpenAI. I was created by /u/brianberns. You can find my source code here. Source: over 3 years ago
The bot is written in F#, which is a .NET language (like C#). Source: over 3 years ago
This year I've been attempting Advent of Code in my favourite programming language, F#. This is a beginner(ish) centered post about making incremental changes from the smallest possible solution to something more robust. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
I can recommend polyglot notebooks in vs code, so you can mix different languages.Take a look athttps://fsharp.org/ for some project ideas and frameworks. Source: over 3 years ago
I have many less followers on Mastodon than in the Birdsite (40 vs 341), yet my activity has generated many more interactions than there. Not only that, among the users who decided to interact with me I counted: a co-discoverer of the Laniakea supercluster, one of the lead developers behind F#, the author of many important books on Java & JVM, plus many others. I'm literally a nobody, but this time there was no... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
FP devs differ based on language here. Elm, like F#, tends to encourage "a bunch of functions and types in a file". While Elm supports modules, we don't really care where it came from; they're all pure, all deterministic, the compiler tells us if it works. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
You can dive into .NET ecosystem by trying F#. It's functional-first language so this should be familiar. Source: about 4 years ago
ReScript code is just like F# or OCAML; it doesnโt have a function parse phase like JavaScript, so we have to define our functions and types first before we can use them. Thatโs fine, but makes explaining the code backwards (meaning you start at the bottom of the file and work your way up), so weโll start at our lambda handler and explain each part, regardless of where itโs defined. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
F# is a JavaScript and .NET language for web, cloud, data-science, apps and more. Source: over 4 years ago
Let's compare how 3 languages that compile to JavaScript - TypeScript, ReScript and F# with the Fable compiler - are able to chain immutable data. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Some of the most popular programming languages include Haskell, Clojure, Scala, Erlang, F#, Rust, etc. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
9) Check out the links under "Contribute" here: https://fsharp.org/. Source: almost 5 years ago
That's what I thought until I stumbled upon F# where whitespace indenting is optional; you can use either semicolons or new lines. Source: about 5 years ago
If you're interested, check out Cornell's course/book, Functional Programming in OCaml. It's an excellent resource for learning FP, using a language called OCaml that's pretty easy to learn and read. (And also just a nice language in general.) You can even sort of indirectly translate the OCaml knowledge to Godot, too, because you can piggyback off Godot's C# support to use F#, a language that's loosely related... Source: about 5 years ago
Straight from https://mitls.org/ > The stable version of miTLS including the new 0.9 release are written in F# With F# being a link to http://fsharp.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
I assume he is writing in https://fsharp.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing F# to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is F# good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss F# here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.