Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Boxes.dev should be more popular than Lusha. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
 |
 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | lusha.com | boxes.dev |
| Company | Startup from the United States Β· 100 - 249 employees Β· 2016 | Startup from the United States Β· 1 - 9 employees Β· 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.
Lusha is a continuously updating database that provides B2B Salespeople with targeted, accurate, and timely business information. Lusha aggregates its data from multiple sources, cross-checking and updating LIVE to ensure up-to-the-minute data accuracy and database cleanliness.
Boxes.dev is a cloud development environment for building software with coding agents. It looks like the Codex or Claude desktop apps, but works a bit differently: Everything is in the cloud, so you can close your laptop and nothing stops. Pick up the same sessions from the iOS and Android apps,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to use Lusha
More videos
No Boxes.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0β100% relative to the other.
Share your experience with using Lusha and Boxes.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.
The two overlap heavily: data plus email sequences at a self-serve price. Apolloβs Basic plan includes 30,000 credits a year against 4,800 on Lusha Starter, so Apollo wins on volume, and Lusha wins on simplicity for a...
What is the difference between a prospecting tool and a sales engagement tool? Prospecting tools find and verify contact information. Sales engagement tools run outreach sequences and manage replies. Some platforms,...
Lusha made a name with their Chrome extension β hover over a LinkedIn profile and get the phone number. It's simple and it works. Their data quality for US direct dials is solid. The free tier is slim (5...
We have no reviews of Boxes.dev yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
Most SDR stacks start with a contact database β ZoomInfo, Apollo, or Lusha β and treat enrichment as a one-time step at the top of the funnel. The problem: these databases are 3β18 months stale on average. Job titles change. Companies... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
(disclosure: I'm a founder of yet another T3/Conductor competitor, https://boxes.dev) You might want to do a quick eval of all the products in the space vs your org's needs! There are a lot of options now,... - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
We built https://boxes.dev specifically for cloud dev / isolated VMs (disclosure, I'm one of the founders). Getting work off your laptop is such a productivity boost when you have parallel threads.... - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
Tried Conductor in the past but had migrated all of our teams remote development work to http://boxes.dev as it was much more intuitive and easier to manage parallel workstreams. Would highly recommend it... - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
When comparing Lusha and Boxes.dev, you can also consider the following products.
Apolloβs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Compare Apollo.io to Lusha or Boxes.dev:
ZoomInfo is a B2B database providing detailed business information on people and companies.
Compare ZoomInfo to Lusha or Boxes.dev:
To coding agents what tmux is to terminals. Runs where your agents run: close the laptop, ssh from anywhere, nothing dies.
Compare Herdr to Lusha or Boxes.dev:
