
Apollo.io
Lusha
Snov.io
ZoomInfo
ZeroBounce
Clearbit
NeverBounce
Find all the email addresses related to a domain

Modal
e2b
Herdr
Tensorlake
Codesphere
AppWizzy
InstaVM
Close your laptop again: run Claude Code and Codex in the cloud

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Hunter.io seems to be a lot more popular than Boxes.dev. While we know about 155 links to Hunter.io, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Boxes.dev.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | hunter.io | boxes.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from France | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Hunter.io yet.
Boxes.dev is a cloud development environment for building software with coding agents. It looks like the Codex or Claude desktop apps, but works a bit differently: Everything is in the cloud, so you can close your laptop and nothing stops. Pick up the same sessions from the iOS and Android apps,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
GTA Hunter Review
More videos
No Boxes.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Hunter.io and Boxes.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Hunter, Lusha, and LeadIQ all have free plans. Among paid plans on monthly billing, LeadIQ Pro starts at $20 a month for up to 5 users, and Hunter Starter starts at €49 a month.The cheapest option depends on whether...
Hunter, on the other hand, is built around email discovery, verification, and cold email sequencing. It doesn’t automate LinkedIn actions, but instead helps you find and validate professional email addresses and run...
I tested the waterfall enrichment to understand how it works. Clay pulls the data you need from over 100 sources. Say you want to find your prospect’s valid email address, Clay scans various sources like Hunter,...
We have no reviews of Boxes.dev yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
The real conclusion I'd push back on from every vendor comparison I've read: there is no single tool that solves reverse lookup at 80%+ accuracy with clean data. The waterfall is the answer. The question is whether you build it yourself... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Last year I ran the same LinkedIn Sales Navigator export through three enrichment APIs. Apollo matched 61% of the emails. Hunter.io matched 54%. An OSINT-first pipeline I'd built in n8n — pulling from public sources before hitting any... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
(disclosure: I'm a founder of yet another T3/Conductor competitor, https://boxes.dev) You might want to do a quick eval of all the products in the space vs your org's needs! There are a lot of options now,... - Source: Hacker News / 6 days ago
We built https://boxes.dev specifically for cloud dev / isolated VMs (disclosure, I'm one of the founders). Getting work off your laptop is such a productivity boost when you have parallel threads.... - Source: Hacker News / 6 days ago
Tried Conductor in the past but had migrated all of our teams remote development work to http://boxes.dev as it was much more intuitive and easier to manage parallel workstreams. Would highly recommend it... - Source: Hacker News / 6 days ago
When comparing Hunter.io and Boxes.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Apollo’s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Compare Apollo.io to Hunter.io or Boxes.dev:




Snov.io is a multichannel lead generation and outreach automation platform that helps B2B teams find qualified leads, automate email and LinkedIn campaigns, and manage deals in one built-in CRM.
Compare Snov.io to Hunter.io or Boxes.dev:

To coding agents what tmux is to terminals. Runs where your agents run: close the laptop, ssh from anywhere, nothing dies.
Compare Herdr to Hunter.io or Boxes.dev: